Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.rc0 released

2015-12-12 Thread Francois Bissey
Are you moving sage or is it just after the build? I guess adding header pad_max_install_names on OS X is not a bad idea and would probably help Volker’s work. François > On 13/12/2015, at 18:51, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Building from scratch on OS X 10.11 fails for

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.rc0 released

2015-12-10 Thread Rob Beezer
On SageMathCloud, built from source, passes long tests ("ptestlong"). Development Images and Build Logs available at: https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/53b77207-8614-4086-a032-432af4b4cdbd/files/sage-dev-images/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.rc0 released

2015-12-10 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Since we are apparently in the "rc" phase, I created a 6.11 milestone. I moved #19616 to the new milestone since a sagenb upgrade is something which needs proper beta testing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.rc0 released

2015-12-10 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Dec 9, 2015, at 15:50 , Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from the tarball, successfully, on two OS X systems,