Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-31 Thread Erik Bray
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:05 PM, François Bissey wrote: >> David Coudert got that (on sage-devel I think). Turns out the libpng >> install was broken for some reason and was missing libpng.so. >> ./sage -f libpng >> solves this. But you are the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-31 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:05 PM, François Bissey wrote: > David Coudert got that (on sage-devel I think). Turns out the libpng > install was broken for some reason and was missing libpng.so. > ./sage -f libpng > solves this. But you are the second person reporting this which > makes it suspicious.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-30 Thread François Bissey
David Coudert got that (on sage-devel I think). Turns out the libpng install was broken for some reason and was missing libpng.so. ./sage -f libpng solves this. But you are the second person reporting this which makes it suspicious. Is something out there deleting libpng.so? François > On 31/01/

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-30 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Ralf Stephan wrote: > This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24599 > I'm trying now with the system gcc. I don't have this problem on Ubuntu but I am getting: [giac-1.4.9.45] libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DGIAC_GENERIC_CONSTANTS -Wl,-rpath -Wl

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-29 Thread Justin C. Walker
> On Jan 27, 2018, at 16:08, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from fresh clone/pull of develop branch with no prob

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-28 Thread Ralf Stephan
I confirm that reinstalling internal gcc with 'sage -f gcc' makes giac compile without error. On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:53 AM Ralf Stephan wrote: > That rather points to mpfr as the culprit IMHO. > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:43 AM François Bissey > wrote: > >> Interesting question and I don’t

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
That rather points to mpfr as the culprit IMHO. On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:43 AM François Bissey wrote: > Interesting question and I don’t know. I only know that the failure comes > from mpfr_assert_fail in mpfr-3 code as indicated by your log. > What else, there was a change of soname which mean

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread François Bissey
Interesting question and I don’t know. I only know that the failure comes from mpfr_assert_fail in mpfr-3 code as indicated by your log. What else, there was a change of soname which means that there are incompatibilities between mpfr-3 and mpfr-4 and that is probably at play here. None of the o

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
How can an internal compiler error have some other source code as root cause? On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:30 AM François Bissey wrote: > I made some comments in the ticket. In my initial answer I assumed you were > using the host gcc rather than sage’s one. But I wouldn’t be surprised if > there >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread François Bissey
I made some comments in the ticket. In my initial answer I assumed you were using the host gcc rather than sage’s one. But I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a problem when using a host gcc compiled against mpfr-3.x. This needs to be tested. While rebuilding gcc get rid of the ICE, I think the r

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
Doesn't this simply make internal gcc a dependency? If so then is it enough to change that for the above ticket? On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:17 AM Ralf Stephan wrote: > This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24599 > I'm trying now with the system gcc. > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:09 AM François

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24599 I'm trying now with the system gcc. On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:09 AM François Bissey wrote: > I was going to warn sage-on-gentoo users on this interesting fact that I > experienced > on the experimental branch where I track stuff that Volker merges.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread François Bissey
I was going to warn sage-on-gentoo users on this interesting fact that I experienced on the experimental branch where I track stuff that Volker merges. It is probably an issue in giac, but at the end of the day gcc needs to be rebuilt after mpfr/mpc. I didn’t think about the problem of what happe

[sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta4 released

2018-01-27 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 0a674fd488 (tag: 8.2.beta4, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 8.2.beta4 4d966299d9 Trac #24581: more typos 59