Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-02 Thread Thierry Dumont
afeter a make distclean, building was ok. Le 01/10/2020 à 16:04, Thierry Dumont a écrit : > In my Ubuntu 20-04, upgrading from beta 13 to beta 14 did not succeed: > > First, just a strange warning: > [dochtml] title = self.get_module_docstring_title(module_name) > [dochtml] Warning: Could not

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread John H Palmieri
Please also provide the top-level config.log. On Thursday, October 1, 2020 at 5:11:01 AM UTC-7, Kenji Iohara wrote: > > On OS X.15.7 with Xcode 12, I couldn’t compile > >pynac-0.7.26.sage-2020-04-03.p0 > > . Here is its log-file. > -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread Thierry Dumont
In my Ubuntu 20-04, upgrading from beta 13 to beta 14 did not succeed: First, just a strange warning: [dochtml] title = self.get_module_docstring_title(module_name) [dochtml] Warning: Could not import sage.libs.readline libreadline.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 11:58 AM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > Trac#30675 doesn’t rebase cleanly with develop. Stuck again. Suggestions ? merge, not rebase. It should work. It basically changes 1 file. > > > Le jeudi 1 octobre 2020 à 12:55:17 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : >> >> Well… I

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Trac#30675 doesn’t rebase cleanly with develop. Stuck again. Suggestions ? Le jeudi 1 octobre 2020 à 12:55:17 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > Well… I just scratched my previous install fpr naught, since the problem > was with dochtml… > > Le

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Well… I just scratched my previous install fpr naught, since the problem was with dochtml… Le jeudi 1 octobre 2020 à 11:16:01 UTC+2, François Bissey a écrit : This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30675 as I mentioned to several > people I am surprised > the fact this was needed was not

[sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread Henri Girard
On Ubuntu 20.04 running AMD 16 core +16 Go and SSD, Every thing passed. As I didn't compile sage for a certain time I notice it was quick about 30 mns. I few some messages indicating I should install few libs (new and very important, that a good idea !). Best Henri -- You received this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread François Bissey
This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30675 as I mentioned to several people I am surprised the fact this was needed was not picked up by the bots. Which version of gcc are you using. > On 1/10/2020, at 10:13 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote: > > Upgrading from 9.2.beta13 failed : I had

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread François Bissey
This has been around for ages. In fact for as long as nauty has been in sage. I remember spotting it for the first time in dmesg several years ago. Because it is mostly silent very little effort has put into fixing that so far, at least that I know of. > On 1/10/2020, at 9:20 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon

[sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-09-30 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Again, if there is anything that should be merged in this beta cycle then a positively-reviewed patch has to