> On Jul 25, 2020, at 17:20 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Built from fresh clones of the 9.2.b6 branch, on three
2020-08-01 01:13 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> [...]
> On macOS with Homebrew, `make` finally succeeded.
> [...]
> After that I ran `make testlong` and it started by
> - rebuilding sagelib
> [...]
The result of `make testlong` was: All tests passed!
I then ran `make testalllong and the result was:
```
2020-08-1 01:13 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Building succeeded on Debian 10. Tests (testlong) succeeded too.
>
> $ make testlong
> All tests passed!
>
> Then I tried
>
> $ make testalllong
>
> and to my surprise it built sagelib and dochtml anew.
> A number of files timed out or had faili
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:13 AM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> Building succeeded on Debian 10. Tests (testlong) succeeded too.
>
> $ make testlong
> All tests passed!
>
> Then I tried
>
> $ make testalllong
>
> and to my surprise it built sagelib and dochtml anew.
> A number of files timed
Building succeeded on Debian 10. Tests (testlong) succeeded too.
$ make testlong
All tests passed!
Then I tried
$ make testalllong
and to my surprise it built sagelib and dochtml anew.
A number of files timed out or had failing doctests,
see further email.
On macOS with Homebrew, `
2020-07-31 13:01 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 1:40 PM Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2020-07-31 12:29 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> > >
> > > I guess all of them are actually links to
> > > /usr/local/Cellar/ecl/20.4.24/lib/libecl.20.4.24.dylib
> > > all of them installed by Homebrew.
> > >
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 1:40 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> 2020-07-31 12:29 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:43 PM Samuel Lelièvre:
> > >
> > > 2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> > > >
> > > > Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in
> > >
2020-07-31 12:29 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:43 PM Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> > >
> > > Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in
> > > /usr/local ?
> > >
> > > (or just ecl*.[dylib,so] - I recall at some poi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:43 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> 2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> >
> > Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in
> > /usr/local ?
> >
> > (or just ecl*.[dylib,so] - I recall at some point the naming was off)
>
> Here is what I have:
>
2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in
> /usr/local ?
>
> (or just ecl*.[dylib,so] - I recall at some point the naming was off)
Here is what I have:
```
$ find /usr/local -iname "ecl*.so"
$ find /usr/local -iname "ecl*.dylib
Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in
/usr/local ?
(or just ecl*.[dylib,so] - I recall at some point the naming was off)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:43 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> 2020-07-30 18:39 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> >
> > [manifolds] ImportError:
> > dlopen(/op
2020-07-30 18:39 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> [manifolds] ImportError:
> dlopen(/opt/s/sage92b6/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/libs/ecl.cpython-37m-darwin.so,
> 2): Symbol not found: _
> ecl_process_env
> [manifolds] Referenced from:
> /opt/s/sage92b6/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/li
[manifolds] ImportError:
dlopen(/opt/s/sage92b6/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/libs/ecl.cpython-37m-darwin.so,
2): Symbol not found: _
ecl_process_env
[manifolds] Referenced from:
/opt/s/sage92b6/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/libs/ecl.cpython-37m-darwin.so
did you source .homeb
2020-07-29 18:13 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 4:37:52 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> The errors seem to involve Flint. I have Flint 2.6.1 from Homebrew.
>>
>> Should I
>> - uninstall Homebrew's flint and try again?
>
> Yes please, so that we can get https://trac.s
On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 4:37:52 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> The errors seem to involve Flint. I have Flint 2.6.1 from Homebrew.
>
> Should I
> - uninstall Homebrew's flint and try again?
>
>
Yes please, so that we can get https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30227 done
--
You receive
2020-07-29 08:39:13 UTC, François Bissey:
>
> The important bits from that last log
> [198/517] creating build/[...]/build/cythonized/sage/libs/arb
> [...]
> In file included from build/cythonized/sage/libs/arb/arith.c:656:
> In file included from build/cythonized/sage/libs/arb/arb_wrap.h:14:
> In
The important bits from that last log
[198/517] creating
build/temp.macosx-10.14-x86_64-3.7/build/cythonized/sage/libs/arb
clang -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code -fno-common -dynamic
-DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -isysroot
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.
2020-07-26 20:46:10 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> From your log:
>
> [ 4/517] clang -Wno-unused-result [...]
> -I/opt/s/sage92b6/local/include/singular
> -I/opt/s/sage92b6/local/include/ -std=c++11
> In file included from [...]/letterplace_ideal.cpp:675:
> /usr/local/include/singular/Singular/libsingul
Please post logs
On Monday, July 27, 2020 at 4:06:19 PM UTC-7, Kenji Iohara wrote:
>
> On mac OS X.15.6 without gcc@9, I could ompile it.
> Installing gcc@9 with Homebrew, I couldn’t compile arb….
>
> After compilation without gcc@9, making ptestlong, I had the next
> reaction:
>
> -
Fixed in #30227, please test
On Sunday, July 26, 2020 at 12:34:30 PM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> > Date: 2020-07-26 00:20 UTC
> > From: Volker Braun
> > To: sage-release
> > Subject: Sage 9.2.beta6 released
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
> > g
On mac OS X.15.6 without gcc@9, I could ompile it.
Installing gcc@9 with Homebrew, I couldn’t compile arb….
After compilation without gcc@9, making ptestlong, I had the next reaction:
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 125.6 --random
On my Unbuntu 20-0:
* transition from 9.2 beta 5 to beta -: no problem
* make ptestlong : all tests passed !
t.d.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
This will be addressed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30227
On Sunday, July 26, 2020 at 1:46:10 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> From your log:
> [ 4/517] clang -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code
> -fno-common -dynamic -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -isysroot
> /Library
>From your log:
[ 4/517] clang -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code
-fno-common -dynamic -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -isysroot
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.sdk
-I/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.sdk/usr/include
-I/Library/Developer/
Incremental build OK on macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with Homebrew.
may be some .configure has not been executed for you ?
David.
> Le 26 juil. 2020 à 21:34, Samuel Lelièvre a écrit
> :
>
>> Date: 2020-07-26 00:20 UTC
>> From: Volker Braun
>> To: sage-release
>> Subject: Sage 9.2.beta6 released
>>
>>
> Date: 2020-07-26 00:20 UTC
> From: Volker Braun
> To: sage-release
> Subject: Sage 9.2.beta6 released
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
> git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Thanks f
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
ddaba54f6d (tag: 9.2.beta6, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
9.2.beta6
e41d396f5d Trac #30131: 2 internet d
27 matches
Mail list logo