Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta9 released

I think Samuel is correct and #32868 will fix it. I was not running ./bootstrap with a fresh tarball, and I'm glad that with the fix, I will be able to continue not running it. (I think that './configure; make' should be sufficient. I have 'source .homebrew-build-env' in my .profile, so I

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta9 released

I have not experienced what you report. On macOS 10.15.7, I’m always doing: ./bootstrap source .homebrew-build-env ./configure make Best, David. > Le 5 janv. 2022 à 05:10, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > I am having intermittent problems building Sage on OS X from a fresh tarball: > it's

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta9 released

Thanks Volker. On my Mac OS 12.1 with XCode 13.2, I couldn’t compile it :* package:         sagemath_doc_html-none  last build time: Dec 24 23:25  log file:        /Users/iohara/Desktop/sage-9.5.beta9/logs/pkgs/sagemath_doc_html-none.log* package:         fpylll-0.5.6  last build time: Dec 24

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta9 released

The failures in min_max.py are caused by recent giac. See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31563. > On 25/12/2021, at 09:40, Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote: > > FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, ptestlong gives only > two (permanent) failures, both new IIRC : > >

[sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta9 released

As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html c5af19568ca Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta9 b879fe3b055 Trac #32969: some better join in interfaces