Hi,
after upgrading to 2.8.3.3 running scripts on command line (./sage example.sage)
doesn't work anymore
Best,
Marek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/temp/sage-2.7.3 $ ./sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.8.3.3, Release Date: 2007-09-04
On 9/4/07, Markus Fraczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.8.3.3 running scripts on command line (./sage
example.sage)
doesn't work anymore
Thanks. I will post a 2.8.3.4 version that fixes this problem and
remove 2.8.3.3. You can wait for that (an hour), or just pull
My memory could be wrong, but I feel that this exact problem has
occurred before. (The problem of running scripts on the command line not
working -- not necessarily the exact same underlying cause for the
problem.)
This kind of basic functionality should probably be tested somewhere
On 9/4/07, Jonathan Bober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My memory could be wrong, but I feel that this exact problem has
occurred before. (The problem of running scripts on the command line not
working -- not necessarily the exact same underlying cause for the
problem.)
This kind of basic
the compilation of sage-2.8.3.3, but sage -testall seems to do
nothing.
I have just a lot of messages like this :
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/mpl3d/surface.py (skipping) --
nodoctest.py file in directory
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
Hello,
I posted patches to fix this on http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/587
. They should be in sage-2.8.3.3 which was released today. sage -
upgrade should do the trick.
--Mike
On Sep 4, 12:17 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Sep 4, 5:10 pm, Markus Fraczek [EMAIL
Hi,
it's me again, sorry for reporting another (possible) bug within 24 hours...
sage: CC = ComplexField(332)
sage:
Dear Developers
I am running Suse 10.1 and
sage-2.8.3-32bit-linux-suse10-i686-Linux
I can't get lie to build. It complains about not finding -lcurses.
libcurses.a is
not in a standard place (it is in /usr/lib/curses), I tried adding a
symbolic link to
/usr/lib but then the build failed in
On 9/5/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/07, Jonathan Bober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My memory could be wrong, but I feel that this exact problem has
occurred before. (The problem of running scripts on the command line not
working -- not necessarily the exact same
On 9/5/07, Markus Fraczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's me again, sorry for reporting another (possible) bug within 24 hours...
sage: CC = ComplexField(332)
sage:
On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When building any of the 2.8.3.x releases on my 64-bit Opteron 246
running RHEL5, I encounter the following error during the compile of
the
sage-2.8.3.x module.
...
In file included from
On Sep 5, 5:08 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When building any of the 2.8.3.x releases on my 64-bit Opteron 246
running RHEL5, I encounter the following error during the compile of
the
sage-2.8.3.x module.
...
In
On 9/5/07, David DeGeorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers
I am running Suse 10.1 and
sage-2.8.3-32bit-linux-suse10-i686-Linux
I can't get lie to build. It complains about not finding -lcurses.
libcurses.a is
not in a standard place (it is in /usr/lib/curses), I tried adding a
On Sep 5, 7:59 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, David DeGeorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers
I am running Suse 10.1 and
sage-2.8.3-32bit-linux-suse10-i686-Linux
I can't get lie to build. It complains about not finding -lcurses.
libcurses.a is
not
William,
I attempted to build sage-2.8.3.4 from source
using the gcc-4.2.1 compiler suite.
On both my x86-Linux and x86_64-Linux machines
the build succeeded, but 'make test'
hung at
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
Also may I make a small plea that
'make check' be put
On Sep 5, 9:40 pm, Kate Minola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
I attempted to build sage-2.8.3.4 from source
using the gcc-4.2.1 compiler suite.
On both my x86-Linux and x86_64-Linux machines
the build succeeded, but 'make test'
hung at
sage -t
On 9/5/07, Kate Minola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
I attempted to build sage-2.8.3.4 from source
using the gcc-4.2.1 compiler suite.
On both my x86-Linux and x86_64-Linux machines
the build succeeded, but 'make test'
hung at
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
Thanks for reporting this.
This is
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/596
Can you try Ctl-C, Ctl-C (twice in rapid succession)
and see if that works?
++
On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experimenting with the wiki. When I
On 9/5/07, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wishing for a ZZ[x,y] where xy!=yx, but I can't seem to find the way to
construct such a creature. Is it not yet implemented?
In reality, I really only want a monomial so it pretty much boils down to a
free group on x and y, but the
On 9/5/07, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\ Yes, so I found FreeMonoid after sending my first e-mail and was testing it
out. I think I may have found something that is not implemented:
sage: a=FreeMonoid(1,'a').0
sage: a*a
a^2
sage: a.substitute(5)
a # should be 5?
sage:
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 20:54, William Stein wrote:
sage: M.x,y = FreeMonoid(2)
sage: (x*y).substitute(x=1)
x*y # I would think that this is 1*y
I find that result unsatisfactory as well, but I sure don't have a good
idea about what ring (?) the result '1*y' would be a
Hi,
I've released sage-2.8.3.5 which fixes a couple of bugs and minor issues
that came up earlier today.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://www.williamstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
Thanks again! I got the idea now. However, there is a problem which
sticks me in the first stage and if I can solve it so your code work
as prefect for me. The problem is that the instruction
v(z)
is not strong enough for my popuse. It works prefect when z is in k =
GF(2^5) but it is not
23 matches
Mail list logo
