On Oct 22, 2007, at 21:56 , William Stein wrote:
Can I build sage with something like '-j 4'? It's a shame to see
all
those cores sitting idle :-}
It should work, the packages that fail to build properly with j1 (I
believe only Singular is affected) reset that flag. Give it a try and
Picking up this thread:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 21:29 , mabshoff wrote:
On Oct 23, 6:19 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I have to rerun the build from scratch: it seems to depend
on /usr/local/lib: maxima won't run with that name change. I
neglected to note which library
Hello,
I am quite new to SAGE but I think I've found a problem with the
latex(math-expression) command. I've tried with version 2.8.6, 2.8.7
and 2.8.8.1:
The problem seems to be the abs() command. Take any function like
f(x)=2*abs(x) with a changing sign. Entering now latex(f) shows me as
the
On Oct 24, 7:15 pm, marko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am quite new to SAGE but I think I've found a problem with the
latex(math-expression) command. I've tried with version 2.8.6, 2.8.7
and 2.8.8.1:
The problem seems to be the abs() command. Take any function like
f(x)=2*abs(x)
Hello,
I've fixed this issue and have included the patch below. It will be
in the next release which should be come out in the next few days.
Here is the behavior after the patch:
sage: g(x) = 2*abs(x)
sage: latex(g)
x \ {\mapsto}\ {2 \cdot \left| x \right|}
--Mike
I was going to work on the sage wiki's teaching page for linear
algebra, but I got stuck on my first attempt at porting a problem.
The problem was to study the two by two solutions to A^2 = I; in one
of my classes I have students work on that for a day on paper and then
let them use Mathematica
For the past couple of months, I have been researching strategies for
extending SAGE with an interactive 2D/3D environment that would be
significantly more advanced than what current mathematics software
provides. My vision is to be able to place the user into a 3D
environment where they can
We're on symbolic integration techniques in my Calc II class right
now, and SAGE rather nicely deals with many (but not all) of the
standard examples, or makes the usual mistakes various other systems
make (e.g., integrate(1/x) gives ln(x), not ln(abs(x))).
However, I'm stumped as to where this
Is it possible to compile SAGE on Cygwin?
I tried but I'm getting an error at the very beginning of the make
process...
---Fausto
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On 10/24/07, Fausto Arinos Barbuto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to compile SAGE on Cygwin?
I tried but I'm getting an error at the very beginning of the make
process...
Sage definitely cannot be built on Cygwin, and probably never will
be supported on Cygwin. Sage for
10 matches
Mail list logo
