which sage gives /usr/bin/sage which is the usual script which sets
SAGE_ROOT (/usr/local/share/sage-2.10.4 in this case) and
calls /usr/local/share/sage-2.10.4/local/bin/sage-sage.
Things like
env SAGE_ROOT=/usr/local/share/sage-2.10.4 /usr/local/share/
sage-2.10.4/local/bin/sage-sage
On Mar 27, 7:03 am, Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which sage gives /usr/bin/sage which is the usual script which sets
SAGE_ROOT (/usr/local/share/sage-2.10.4 in this case) and
calls /usr/local/share/sage-2.10.4/local/bin/sage-sage.
Things like
env SAGE_ROOT=/usr/local/share/sage-2.10.4
I want to extract the real part of a quaternion, i.e., if
L.i,j,k = QuaternionAlgebra(QQ,-1,-1);
and a is in L, then I want the coefficient of 1 in the expansion of as
a linear
combination of 1, i, j and k.
Is there a way to do this? A graceful way?
(I have also discovered that using
Just for reference, two comments on the documentation for quaternions:
If x is an element of L as below, then neither x? nor x?? returns any
information about methods that apply to x.
Second, in the documentation on quaternions in the reference manual,
there is no reference that
I could find to
These are curiosity questions. Hope someone knows, but perhaps some
are just buried a little deeper in the documentation than I thought.
1. The solve wrapper of maxima does some nice stuff symbolically, but
of course it can't handle everything, like
sage: solve(x^5-x-12,x)
[0 == x^5 - x - 12]
Please find below links to the install.log and the output of uname -a
http://syntaxthug.syntaxpolice.org/~ralf/install.log
http://syntaxthug.syntaxpolice.org/~ralf/uname.txt
I think that I have enough room for an install.
The first install failed for lack of space and then I wrote to the
host
Hello,
1. The solve wrapper of maxima does some nice stuff symbolically, but
of course it can't handle everything, like
sage: solve(x^5-x-12,x)
[0 == x^5 - x - 12]
which makes sense! But I poked around a little for a numerical
approximation of solutions command and didn't find
On Mar 27, 4:55 pm, Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Michael,
I feel embarrassed causing so much trouble While answering your
email I finally solved the problem
(which was my fault of course). I turned out that I had a stray libstdc
++.so.6 in my home directory which
On Mar 28, 5:04 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:36 PM, toothpaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please find below links to the install.log and the output of uname -a
http://syntaxthug.syntaxpolice.org/~ralf/install.log
