I had a similar failure today, trying to:
r.install_packages(adapt)
after some fussing, runing ./sage as root, and using the notebook
interface I could get through the download phase, but same sorts of
failures in just as the gcc kicks in. Seems several of the key R
scripts have
Hi!
Is it possible to get order of root of equation? For example equation:
f(x)=(x+1)^2
and it's solution solve(f,x) will be [x == -1], but this is not
perfect clear, because x==-1 have second order. This equation actually
must have two same roots: [x == -1,x == -1].
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Sand Wraith omegat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible to get order of root of equation? For example equation:
f(x)=(x+1)^2
and it's solution solve(f,x) will be [x == -1], but this is not
perfect clear, because x==-1 have second order. This equation
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:19 AM, ztnews cronin.vin...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a similar failure today, trying to:
r.install_packages(adapt)
after some fussing, runing ./sage as root, and using the notebook
interface I could get through the download phase, but same sorts of
failures in just
On Jan 9, 6:51 am, Slava slava_se...@mail.ru wrote:
I`m trying to solve such simple system of equations: [sqrt(x) == 1, x
== y],
so I type:
x,y = var('x,y');
solve([sqrt(x) == 1, x == y], x, y);
the answer is: []
If I understand correctly, Sage punts to Maxima to solve equations.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Robert Dodier robert.dod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 6:51 am, Slava slava_se...@mail.ru wrote:
I`m trying to solve such simple system of equations: [sqrt(x) == 1, x
== y],
so I type:
x,y = var('x,y');
solve([sqrt(x) == 1, x == y], x, y);
the answer is:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:05 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Robert Dodier robert.dod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 6:51 am, Slava slava_se...@mail.ru wrote:
I`m trying to solve such simple system of equations: [sqrt(x) == 1, x
== y],
so I type:
I'm having difficulty running Sage in the background on a Mac with OSX.
5 and getting the output saved in a file. I tried a few permutations
with different results so I expect I'm making a silly error. Here's
what I've seen.
Since the program runs fine in some of the scenarios, I don't think
On Jan 9, 1:53 pm, Tom haged...@tcnj.edu wrote:
I'm having difficulty running Sage in the background on a Mac with OSX.
5 and getting the output saved in a file. I tried a few permutations
with different results so I expect I'm making a silly error. Here's
what I've seen.
Since the
Is this a bug?
sage: Set([])
{}
sage: Set(Set([]))
{}
sage: Set([]) == Set(Set([]))
True
In general, are Sage Sets supposed to behave like mathematical sets?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this a bug?
sage: Set([])
{}
sage: Set(Set([]))
{}
sage: Set([]) == Set(Set([]))
True
This is because Set takes a list (iterable) for all the of the
elements of the set. So, if you want to construct the
On Jan 9, 3:40 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is this a bug?
sage: Set([])
{}
sage: Set(Set([]))
{}
sage: Set([]) ==
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:42 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 3:40 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
