[sage-support] Re: crash with groebner basis

2009-02-04 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 4, 6:18 am, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote: hi, Hi Pierre, i'm sure this used to work with earlier versions of sage, but now i'm getting this: sage: R.a,b = QQ[] sage: I= [a-b, a+2*b]*R sage: I.groebner_basis() SNIP RuntimeError: Singular error:    ? cannot open

[sage-support] Re: crash with groebner basis

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Wednesday 04 February 2009, mabshoff wrote: FWIW: worksforme $ sage -- | Sage Version 3.2.3, Release Date: 2009-01-05 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|

[sage-support] Re: crash with groebner basis

2009-02-04 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 4, 6:58 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote: On Wednesday 04 February 2009, mabshoff wrote: FWIW: worksforme I am not 100% sure what you are driving at, but I guess it is the comment about bug fixes. With that I specifically meant John Perry's fix at #5125. There

[sage-support] Re: crash with groebner basis

2009-02-04 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 4, 6:57 am, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pierre, thanks for such a quick reply ! Well, I am just hanging out in IRC waiting for my Sage builds to finish :)  (b) The more entertaining bug: LIB is the same as lib on OSX since the default filesystem is case aware, but

[sage-support] crash with groebner basis

2009-02-04 Thread Pierre
hi, i'm sure this used to work with earlier versions of sage, but now i'm getting this: sage: R.a,b = QQ[] sage: I= [a-b, a+2*b]*R sage: I.groebner_basis() --- RuntimeError Traceback (most

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread kcrisman
Maybe they contain the revision history? That could make them big. They must do something like this, or at least it includes graphics from the temp directory or something. I just tried a worksheet that had had some graphics in it. I deleted those cells. The size of the download didn't go

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread Jason Grout
kcrisman wrote: Maybe they contain the revision history? That could make them big. They must do something like this, or at least it includes graphics from the temp directory or something. I just tried a worksheet that had had some graphics in it. I deleted those cells. The size

[sage-support] Re: crash with groebner basis

2009-02-04 Thread Pierre
thanks for such a quick reply !  (b) The more entertaining bug: LIB is the same as lib on OSX since the default filesystem is case aware, but case insensitve. But you can create a case-sensitive HFS volume on OSX where the above error would manifest itself. ah, this is it. See, i've

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread kcrisman
When you delete all output, does that actually delete the physical images in the cell directory?  (You may not know, but someone can check). Not only does it not remove the physical images e.g. sage0.png, it doesn't even remove the cell directories!!! My current worksheet only has cells 4,

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread Jason Grout
kcrisman wrote: When you delete all output, does that actually delete the physical images in the cell directory? (You may not know, but someone can check). Not only does it not remove the physical images e.g. sage0.png, it doesn't even remove the cell directories!!! My current worksheet

[sage-support] define a ring with the indeterminates integeres modulo 2

2009-02-04 Thread Adela
hello! My question is how can I define in Saga a ring with indeterminates modulo 2? Thank you! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[sage-support] Re: define a ring with the indeterminates integeres modulo 2

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Adela wrote: hello! My question is how can I define in Saga a ring with indeterminates modulo 2? You're either looking for a polynomial ring over GF(2): sage: P.x = PolynomialRing(GF(2)) sage: P Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Finite Field of size 2

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread kcrisman
I consider it a bug too.  Can you open a ticket for it? This is now # 5177. - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[sage-support] What is URL for remote sage access?

2009-02-04 Thread rvaug...@gmail.com
I installed sage locally on a Fedora Core 10 machine. My user wants to access this installation remotely. When he runs sage on his (Mac) laptop, it tells him to open his browser to http://localhost:8000. What is the URL? Is it port 8000? The machine name is strings358. I tried

[sage-support] Re: What is URL for remote sage access?

2009-02-04 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 4, 1:00 pm, rvaug...@gmail.com rvaug...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Richard, I installed sage locally on a Fedora Core 10 machine. My user wants to access this installation remotely. When he runs sage on his (Mac) laptop, it tells him to open his browser tohttp://localhost:8000. What is

[sage-support] Which Version of Sage to Use?

2009-02-04 Thread mrotsliah
I'm Running SuSE Linux 9.0 (i586) VERSION = 9.0 with architecture i686. So, I'm guessing 32bit, but not tottaly sure. I looked at the web page http://www.sagemath.org/bin/linux/ and under 32bit I tried sage-3.2.3-opensuse-32bit-intel_xeon-i686-Linux.tar.gz So, I installing it, and Sage

[sage-support] Re: Which Version of Sage to Use?

2009-02-04 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 4, 1:19 pm, mrotsliah mrotsl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm Running SuSE Linux 9.0 (i586) VERSION = 9.0 SuSE 9.0 is quite old. It was actually the last SuSE release I ran and the laptop I used it with has since long been retired :) with architecture i686.  So, I'm guessing 32bit,

[sage-support] does Sage work for finfing Groebner basis for a very large system?

2009-02-04 Thread Adela
I need to solve a big system of nonlinear equations(it consists of 114 equations, with 61 indeterminates, all of them can be only 0 and 1 and I work modulo 2). I solve it using Groebner bases. So, my problem coms to finding the reduced Groebner base for an ideal generated by 114 polynomials.

[sage-support] Re: does Sage work for finfing Groebner basis for a very large system?

2009-02-04 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Adela wrote: I need to solve a big system of nonlinear equations(it consists of 114 equations, with 61 indeterminates, all of them can be only 0 and 1 and I work modulo 2). I solve it using Groebner bases. So, my problem coms to finding the reduced Groebner

[sage-support] Re: Which Version of Sage to Use?

2009-02-04 Thread mrotsliah
ok, I found the source code, I used tar to open it, and I used make. It ran its course and finished. Sage starts to run, but then it outputs the following and then quits: -- | Sage Version 3.2.3, Release Date: 2009-01-05

[sage-support] Re: Which Version of Sage to Use?

2009-02-04 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 4, 7:26 pm, mrotsliah mrotsl...@gmail.com wrote: ok, I found the source code, I used tar to open it, and I used make. It ran its course and finished.  Sage starts to run, but then it outputs the following and then quits:

[sage-support] showing the answer of solve in the notebook.

2009-02-04 Thread adrian
If, in the notebook one writes: a,b,c,d,n=var('a b c d n') solve([a*d-b*c==1,a*d/(a*d - b*c) - c*(a*n + b)/(a*d - b*c)==1,c*d/ (a*d - b*c) - c*(c*n + d)/(a*d - b*c)==0, a*(c*n + d)/(a*d - b*c) -b*c/ (a*d - b*c)==1],a,b,c,d) sage does not return anything. if one does, instead a,b,c,d,n=var('a b