On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Taxman wrote:
>
>> That is exactly what you should expect, since the tikzpicture
>> environment is only defined when you are using the tikz package.
>>
>> Perhaps we should update the documentation on the Sage graphs stuff to
>> make it (more?) clear that the outpu
> That is exactly what you should expect, since the tikzpicture
> environment is only defined when you are using the tikz package.
>
> Perhaps we should update the documentation on the Sage graphs stuff to
> make it (more?) clear that the output only makes sense in a document
> that uses TikZ.
Ri
Yes, that seems to do the trick. Thanks!
-Mike
On Jul 10, 5:56 pm, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> I am not sure but I think when objects are added together their
> bounding boxes are checked, which might result in the -2 to 2
> plotrange you are seeing. So you might have to do:
>
> (e+p).show(xmax =
I am not sure but I think when objects are added together their
bounding boxes are checked, which might result in the -2 to 2
plotrange you are seeing. So you might have to do:
(e+p).show(xmax = 2, xmin = -2)
to get what you want.
-M. Hampton
On Jul 9, 5:14 pm, Mike Witt wrote:
> var('t')
>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 at 08:11AM -0700, Taxman wrote:
> Oh, I forgot to mention, Ubuntu 9.04's pgf is at the latest version
> 2.0
>
> I think my first message was really unclear. What I meant was, if I
> include \usepackage{tikz} at the top of a tex file and render it
> manually on the command line,
Want to review it? :)
On Jul 10, 6:03 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Marshall Hampton wrote:
> > In case anyone looked at that in the last few hours, I replaced the
> > patch recently with some fixes and minor speedups.
>
> I noticed!
>
> Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To p
Marshall Hampton wrote:
> In case anyone looked at that in the last few hours, I replaced the
> patch recently with some fixes and minor speedups.
>
I noticed!
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsu
In case anyone looked at that in the last few hours, I replaced the
patch recently with some fixes and minor speedups.
-Marshall
On Jul 10, 3:22 pm, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> A slightly revised effort is now up for review as trac #6509:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6509
>
> -Ma
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:05 PM, vaiby wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have 2x2 matrices x, y, z whose entries are polynomials in 3
> variables.
> [In fact each matrix involves only one variable, and its terms are
> linear over complex numbers in that variable].
> I want to solve a equation like : x*y*z ==
If it works don't fix. I like 3.2.2 because of the output in a
textarea is nicer than 4.0. I will leave it along.
On Jul 10, 10:19 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Mikie wrote:
>
> > I am using 3.2.2 sage. Will this fix work?
>
> No idea, but it might. You can try it
A slightly revised effort is now up for review as trac #6509:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6509
-Marshall
On Jul 10, 2:08 pm, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> I have tested this up to 1, seems to work:
>
> def brute_force_s4(n):
> '''
> Brute force search for decomposition in
I have tested this up to 1, seems to work:
def brute_force_s4(n):
'''
Brute force search for decomposition into a sum of four squares,
for cases that the main algorithm fails to handle.
'''
for i in range(0,int(sqrt(n))+1):
for j in range(i,int(sqrt(n-i^2))+1):
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Santanu
> Sarkar wrote:
>> Is the algorithm for sum of four square i,e every positive integer
>> can be expressed as the sum of four square is implemented in
>> Sage
>
> If you're referring to Lagrange's four-square theorem, then Sa
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm CC'ing this to sage-windows, as your questions are very relevant
> to the Windows port of Sage.
>
> --
> Regards
> Minh Van Nguyen
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:46 AM, DigDug_the_2nd
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, that's really helpful.
>
Hi.
I have 2x2 matrices x, y, z whose entries are polynomials in 3
variables.
[In fact each matrix involves only one variable, and its terms are
linear over complex numbers in that variable].
I want to solve a equation like : x*y*z == m[m a given matrix]
(Of course it is just a bunch of four
Since that was a first stab at it, I doubt it is better than the built-
in. In order to handle special cases, I think my code could fall back
on some brute-force version like:
def brute_force_s4(n):
for i in range(0,int(sqrt(n))):
for j in range(i,int(sqrt(n-i^2))):
for k
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
> I tried to do this for fun, but my code doesn't quite work. There is
> a java applet with quite readable source code available at:
> http://www.alpertron.com.ar/FSQUARES.HTM
> I was trying to implement the ideas at: http://www.schorn.c
I tried to do this for fun, but my code doesn't quite work. There is
a java applet with quite readable source code available at:
http://www.alpertron.com.ar/FSQUARES.HTM
I was trying to implement the ideas at: http://www.schorn.ch/howto.html
but I am out of time for now, maybe someone else can fi
On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Mikie wrote:
> I am using 3.2.2 sage. Will this fix work?
No idea, but it might. You can try it out.
> The work around is
> working for me and I would like not to damage the 40 stat functions I
> have created.
Are you talking about modifications to the library it
I am using 3.2.2 sage. Will this fix work? The work around is
working for me and I would like not to damage the 40 stat functions I
have created.
Thanks
On Jul 10, 3:10 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 9 Jul 2009, at 15:02, William
You could try to get the paper through your library or pay for it from
Wiley. Here's the citation and link:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/113400834/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@google
Oh, I forgot to mention, Ubuntu 9.04's pgf is at the latest version
2.0
I think my first message was really unclear. What I meant was, if I
include \usepackage{tikz} at the top of a tex file and render it
manually on the command line, then I don't get the Unknown environment
"tikzpicture" error,
Hi there,
you possibly just need to install the newest pgf tex package. You can
download it from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/
unpack the tgz file, copy the contents of the pgf inside a
location where your tex system can find it,
if you want a local installation just for one user, th
Hi
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Santanu
Sarkar wrote:
> Is the algorithm for sum of four square i,e every positive integer
> can be expressed as the sum of four square is implemented in
> Sage
If you're referring to Lagrange's four-square theorem, then Sage
probably doesn't have it yet:
Hi, I was motivated to install Sage from the Graph Theory example on
http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/sage-4-0-2-released/ (the
release tour). To run it I downloaded tkz-berge.sty and tkz-graph.sty,
but I still get the error Unknown environment "tikzpicture" on running
the example.
Doing som
Is the algorithm for sum of four square i,e every positive integer
can be expressed as the sum of four square is implemented in
Sage
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Thanks everyone! Answers are really helpful!
I'll try this "simple_server" snippet.
2009/7/9 Robert Bradshaw :
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Hi Aleksey,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Aleksey
>> Gogolev wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Advise needed.
>>>
>>> I have
David is right, you should be possible to do what you want using the
log function in the units module.
When Sage has better support for f.g. abelian groups (which is on its
way, I think) this kind of thing should be simpler to do.
John Cremona
On Jul 9, 11:55 am, davidloeffler wrote:
> On Jul
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> On 9 Jul 2009, at 15:02, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mikie
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert, how do I update my sage installation when you create a
>>> patch. Do I have to reinstall Sage?
>>> Thanx
>>
>> I just did
>>
>>
UPDATE: So I just started watching the first screencast, Episode 1,
and realized I had the window to notebook already open, just didn't
know it was the window to use sage. It seems despite my Terminal
problem, I really don't have a problem. Unless you see that I need to
fix something, I'll cons
30 matches
Mail list logo
