Hi Taxman,
Thanks for the excellent suggestions - this is next in my queue. Yes,
some TeX guidance would be helpful, and I'm going to add some, but its
not going to become a full-blown tutorial on installing new TeX
packages. That's "out of scope." ;-)
texhash, mktexls-r, kpsewhich and some n
On Jul 12, 1:22 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Taxman,
>
> Thanks for the report. Current behavior is to support latex versions
> of graphs by adding two "\usepackage" commands to the preamble. It is
> possible tkz-arith.sty should also be added, and maybe something
> bigger like tikz and pgf.
>
On Jul 12, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>> Thanks for your quick answers. Coming from Mathematica, I was
>> expecting to
>> add lists as vectors, multiply real numbers by lists, etc, without
>> sub-classing or using another types (such as vectors in sage)
Sag
On Jul 13, 2009, at 6:18 AM, mac8090 wrote:
> Hi
>
> A recent calculation I made in Sage (version 3.4) gave me a matrix
> where each value was out by a decimal less than 10 x e-16 or e-17. I
> have two questions:
>
> 1. Is this a usual rounding error in sage or is there an error in my
> calculati
Hi
A recent calculation I made in Sage (version 3.4) gave me a matrix
where each value was out by a decimal less than 10 x e-16 or e-17. I
have two questions:
1. Is this a usual rounding error in sage or is there an error in my
calculations? I didn't notice anything to do with rounding when I w
On Jul 12, 9:05 pm, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
> Thanks for your quick answers. Coming from Mathematica, I was expecting to
> add lists as vectors, multiply real numbers by lists, etc, without
> sub-classing or using another types (such as vectors in sage)
just to clarify this, working on lists witho
