[sage-support] Re: GAP logfile

2009-09-18 Thread Simon King
Hi William, On 18 Sep., 23:27, William Stein wrote: > You should look at interfaces/gap.py.  There's a function "eval" in > there.  Just add your own hack at the top that opens some logfile and > appends to it. I tried to do it such that the value of input_line in the eval() method is logged.

[sage-support] Re: eigenvalue difficulties

2009-09-18 Thread Chris Godsil
Thanks again. Tried that too, no effect - same error. I have access to a Mac running 10.5, so it will not it be a serious problem if I have to wait for the nest release. And I should be writing reference letters anyway... Chris On Sep 18, 11:31 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009

[sage-support] Re: eigenvalue difficulties

2009-09-18 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Chris Godsil wrote: > > Thanks.  I tried that but the problem remains. One other thing to try would be to rebuild the sage<-->linbox extension (which is easy). Just do the following from the root of your Sage install: flat:sage wstein$ touch devel/sage/sage/libs

[sage-support] Re: eigenvalue difficulties

2009-09-18 Thread Chris Godsil
Thanks. I tried that but the problem remains. Chris On Sep 18, 11:07 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Chris Godsil wrote: > > > I'm running Mac OS X 10.6.1.  The command matrix.eigenvalues() has > > stopped working, as follows: > > You have to force a rebuild of lin

[sage-support] Re: eigenvalue difficulties

2009-09-18 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Chris Godsil wrote: > > I'm running Mac OS X 10.6.1.  The command matrix.eigenvalues() has > stopped working, as follows: You have to force a rebuild of linbox. This will get fully resolved when Sage gets ported to OS X 10.6. sage -f linbox-1.1.6.p0 Wil

[sage-support] eigenvalue difficulties

2009-09-18 Thread Chris Godsil
I'm running Mac OS X 10.6.1. The command matrix.eigenvalues() has stopped working, as follows: wombat:sgwork chris$ sage -- | Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, an

[sage-support] Digamma Function in 4.1.1

2009-09-18 Thread The_Fool
While working with the derivative of the Gamma function, the digamma function is obviously involved. The sage "diff" function does show Γ '(x) == Γ(x)ψ(x) like it should, however, the digamma function (called psi in sage) is not defined whenever I try to do anything with it. It seems as if only

[sage-support] Re: GAP logfile

2009-09-18 Thread William Stein
2009/9/18 Simon King : > > Dear Sage Support, > > I'd like to debug some ugly problem that I have with GAP (really > mysterious: Compute some examples -> example #45 fails with a > recursion depth trap -> repeat example #45 -> it works without problem > -> compute more examples -> #110 fails -> re

[sage-support] GAP logfile

2009-09-18 Thread Simon King
Dear Sage Support, I'd like to debug some ugly problem that I have with GAP (really mysterious: Compute some examples -> example #45 fails with a recursion depth trap -> repeat example #45 -> it works without problem -> compute more examples -> #110 fails -> repeat #110 -> it works). I know how

[sage-support] Re: solve(x==sqrt(99),x)

2009-09-18 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT) "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote: > > Dear users of Sage, sorry to bother again, with checked Typeset button > the command > > solve(x==sqrt(99),x) > > gives x==3*sqrt(11) > > However sqrt(99) gives 3\,\sqrt{11}. I think that this second format > should be us

[sage-support] solve(x==sqrt(99),x)

2009-09-18 Thread ma...@mendelu.cz
Dear users of Sage, sorry to bother again, with checked Typeset button the command solve(x==sqrt(99),x) gives x==3*sqrt(11) However sqrt(99) gives 3\,\sqrt{11}. I think that this second format should be used also in the first case and I am almost sure that it was in some previoous versions of S

[sage-support] Re: derivative of cotangent

2009-09-18 Thread Burcin Erocal
Hi Jason, On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:15:46 -0500 Jason Grout wrote: > > On alpha.sagenb.org, I get the following: > > sage: t=var('t') > sage: diff(cot(t),t) > D[0](cot)(t) > sage: diff(cos(t)/sin(t),t) > -cos(t)^2/sin(t)^2 - 1 > > > Does Sage not know that cot(t) is cos(t)/sin(t)? Or am I jus

[sage-support] derivative of cotangent

2009-09-18 Thread Jason Grout
On alpha.sagenb.org, I get the following: sage: t=var('t') sage: diff(cot(t),t) D[0](cot)(t) sage: diff(cos(t)/sin(t),t) -cos(t)^2/sin(t)^2 - 1 Does Sage not know that cot(t) is cos(t)/sin(t)? Or am I just being silly? Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to t

[sage-support] Re: tinyMCE bug (charcters řčě etc.)

2009-09-18 Thread kcrisman
See http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6464 . This will be in Sage 4.1.2, which will be out end of the month or so. - kcrisman On Sep 18, 2:01 pm, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote: > Hello all, thank you for such a wonderfull software like Sage. I > appretitate the support for nonenglish languages i

[sage-support] tinyMCE bug (charcters ř čě etc.)

2009-09-18 Thread ma...@mendelu.cz
Hello all, thank you for such a wonderfull software like Sage. I appretitate the support for nonenglish languages in commnets has been added some moths ago. However, I returned to Sage after several moths without any CAS and observed, that if I use letters like ěščř in TinyMCE editor, save and the

[sage-support] adding complete torsion of an elliptic curve

2009-09-18 Thread Hendrik
Hi, First of all, I'm very happy with the things I can do with elliptic curves over number fields in Sage. My problem: I want to add the complete 4-torsion of E27a3 to the rationals, i.e. I want K=Q(E[4]). My situation is more or less similar to: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt/browse_thr