> Or get someone to review http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9828so we
> can get 0.13 into
> Sage.
>
Is anyone planning to do this?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups
Thanks, Minh - the second option seems as though it would be more
useful.
Can also do it with
hex(operator.xor(0x2bd5427c, 0x65ef24ab))
-Alasdair
On Sep 24, 2:14 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Alasdair,
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Alasdair wrote:
> > Is there a more direct way? In pyt
Hi list,
I wonder if there is any command similar to subsop in maple
(www.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=subsop).
There is an operands(), but I don't see how substitutions can be made
from it.
Antonio
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsu
If I make a polynomial ring using
sage: b = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x')
I get some odd behavior. Namely,
sage: bool(b(x)==x)
True
sage: b(x)
x
sage: type(b(x))
sage: type(x)
This isn't really that odd, but still I don't know whether it is good
that one can still use x as a symbolic variable. Pr
On Sep 24, 6:56 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> If I make a polynomial ring using
>
> sage: b = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x')
>
> I get some odd behavior. Namely,
>
> sage: bool(b(x)==x)
> True
I personally find this slightly worrisome, but this was a design
decision (equality respects automatic coercions)
> s
