On Apr 6, 7:31 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:31 AM, VictorMiller victorsmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Is sagenb.org having problems? I tried to log on yesterday (and
today, just now), and it said that my username was unknown!
I have the same problem with the
I'm encountering a problem with graphics_array and latex use in plots.
The following command works fine
p1=plot(x^2, (x, -pi, pi), color='blue')
G=graphics_array(((p1,p1),(p1,p1)))
G.show(figsize=[8,8])
But if latex code is added to the plot legend it produced and error
p1=plot(x^2, (x, -pi,
Actually, to correct myself, it appears that the problem is not latex
in the legend label, but the mere presence of a legend label at all.
The following still produces an pop error
p1=plot(x^2, (x, -pi, pi), color='blue',legend_label=f)
G=graphics_array(((p1,p1),(p1,p1)))
G.show(figsize=[8,8])
I have a python type function taking two variables is defined in such
a say that accidental evaluation is a possibility. Here is a
simplified version
def h(x,n):
if x2:
return n-x
else:
return n*x-2
How can functions like this be plotted over x for a constant
On Friday, April 8, 2011 11:03:14 AM UTC-7, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
I have a python type function taking two variables is defined in such
a say that accidental evaluation is a possibility. Here is a
simplified version
def h(x,n):
if x2:
return n-x
else:
Or:
sage: plot(lambda x: h(x,3), (x, 0, 4),exclude=[2])
On 8 Kwi, 21:00, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 8, 2011 11:03:14 AM UTC-7, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
I have a python type function taking two variables is defined in such
a say that accidental
On Apr 8, 1:04 pm, ObsessiveMathsFreak obsessivemathsfr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Actually, to correct myself, it appears that the problem is not latex
in the legend label, but the mere presence of a legend label at all.
The following still produces an pop error
p1=plot(x^2, (x, -pi, pi),
This works for me:
p1=plot(x^2, (x, -pi, pi),label=f)
G=graphics_array(((p1,p1),(p1,p1)))
G.show(figsize=[8,8])
On 8 Kwi, 18:54, ObsessiveMathsFreak obsessivemathsfr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm encountering a problem with graphics_array and latex use in plots.
The following command works fine
That worked, thank you. But I don't understand why the standard
notation has so many problems. What exactly is going wrong?
On Apr 8, 8:00 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 8, 2011 11:03:14 AM UTC-7, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
I have a python type function
This notation isn't very flexible though. For example, suppose I
wanted to plot h(-x,n) over the same range.
Can this be done without calling the symbolic engine? Is there a way
to bypass symbolic plots altogether?
On Apr 8, 11:25 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday,
On Apr 8, 11:25 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 8, 2011 2:51:03 PM UTC-7, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
That worked, thank you. But I don't understand why the standard
notation has so many problems. What exactly is going wrong?
I think this is what's
On Friday, April 8, 2011 3:59:23 PM UTC-7, ObsessiveMathsFreak wrote:
This notation isn't very flexible though. For example, suppose I
wanted to plot h(-x,n) over the same range.
Can this be done without calling the symbolic engine? Is there a way
to bypass symbolic plots altogether?
Got an error while building sage-4.6.2 from source on CentOS 32 bits
Any lead to solve this issue will be much appreciated?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
On Apr 8, 2011, at 21:56 , Olalékan ABOU BAKAR wrote:
Got an error while building sage-4.6.2 from source on CentOS 32 bits
Any lead to solve this issue will be much appreciated?
Normally, one might get better support by providing some details regarding the
problem encountered. Among
14 matches
Mail list logo
