On 11/26/11 3:05 PM, pong wrote:
Two days ago during Thanksgiving dinner, I tried showing SAGE notebook
to my cousin who has an Android tablet. Well... I then realized that
Jmol (or rather Java runtime environment) is not supported on android
(at least not out of the box)
My questions are:
1)
I am trying to set up sage using vitualbox. What base memory should I
set in virtualbox for the sage ? While setting up, I assigned 1024 MB
base memory. Later the Virtualbox keeps reminding me that base memory
is more than 50 % of total memory (1.74 GB) and there might be
problems.
If you
Applying expand(ratsimp( )); to your %o15 one can obtain Dan's result.
The problem is that the integral should not depend on the center of
the circle
containing the pole. It looks like maxima bug (?)
Sometimes ago there was an example of failing complex calculations on
ask.sagemath.org
Thank you very much to everyone for all your help.
I've now solved the issue I was having trouble with - the reason
finding the coefficients of the y terms didn't give me the required
results was because the generating function was really in terms of one
variable (p), not two, and required values
Hi all,
I've completed some analysis using the version of SAGE (internet
version), and wondered if you could provide guidance on the best way
to export the outputted results to another package, such as Excel?
Is this actually possible, without installing SAGE as a package on my
computer? If so,
On 12/6/11 5:36 AM, Julie wrote:
Hi all,
I've completed some analysis using the version of SAGE (internet
version), and wondered if you could provide guidance on the best way
to export the outputted results to another package, such as Excel?
Is this actually possible, without installing SAGE
Well there is of course the possibility to use only ascii (but I guess you
already thought of that), the other solution would involve hacking the sage
source code, since matplotlib has unicode support [1] this should be
posssible. A third solution is to use matplotlib directly, from sage you
Dear Vasudev,
Sage ships it's own version of python. And this python doesn't use the
system python. When you installed matplotlib using yum, yum took care of
all dependency's for you. To get other python packages in sage you should
do:
sage -sh #this starts up a shell with all environment
The problem is that the integral should not depend on the center of
the circle
containing the pole. It looks like maxima bug (?)
I've reported this at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=4933atid=104933
Dan, if you want to open a ticket, just be sure to refer to that.
--
To post to
thanks emil.
i was able to change the base memory and i set up the system to start
in sage shell. i get to the sage prompt after typing ./sage but i
can't do
any math stuff there. i get the following error.
WARNING! This shell install was built on a machine that supports
instructions that are
On Dec 6, 3:26 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that the integral should not depend on the center of
the circle
containing the pole. It looks like maxima bug (?)
I've reported this
athttps://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=4933atid=104933
Dan, if you want to
On Dec 6, 3:12 pm, issacnewton atisunda...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks emil.
i was able to change the base memory and i set up the system to start
in sage shell. i get to the sage prompt after typing ./sage but i
can't do
any math stuff there. i get the following error.
WARNING! This shell
Looking at the polyhedral computation documentation, I don't think it
does non-linear equations--is there another way of doing that in Sage?
Cal
On Dec 5, 1:45 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think maxima does polyhedral computations in its assume facility,
so you
If you create an actual power series element, you can easily write the
coefficients to a file:
sage: f = taylor(sin(x), x, 0, 10); f
1/362880*x^9 - 1/5040*x^7 + 1/120*x^5 - 1/6*x^3 + x
sage: power_series = RR[['x']](f); power_series
0.000 + 1.00*x + 0.000*x^2 -
Like most lattice basis reduction algorithms, Block Korkin-Zolotarev
reduction is not unique, not even in the case of one block: the first
vector is a shortest vector in the lattice, the second vector corresponds
to a shortest vector in the lattice after projecting onto the orthogonal
I don't know any algorithmic way to solve arbitrary polynomial
inequalities. But e.g. for fixed integers i,j,k you get only linear
constraints in the remaining variables.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi emil
i tried solution a). It was compiling and building for many minutes
and finished at last. after that I typed ./sage and again the same
prompt [sage@sage sage]$ appeared and i tried to
do ordinary math like 2+2, but it says -bash: 2+2:command not found.
so whats problem now ?
thanks
--
On Dec 7, 4:52 am, issacnewton atisunda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi emil
i tried solution a). It was compiling and building for many minutes
and finished at last. after that I typed ./sage and again the same
prompt [sage@sage sage]$ appeared and i tried to
do ordinary math like 2+2, but it says
You should be in the sage root directory now, restart sage server
[sage@localhost ~]$ ./sage .notebook
sorry thats a typo, it should be
[sage@localhost ~]$ ./sage -notebook
actually it should also do if you just shutdown the VM and restart it.
--
To post to this group, send email to
19 matches
Mail list logo
