Re: [sage-support] Re: Strange results in DiGraph.girth()

2012-10-31 Thread Georgi Guninski
If you want to play with digraphs attached is program for generating digraph diregular cages of any girth and degree. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:53:56AM +0100, Nathann Cohen wrote: Some benchmarks on moderate cages (4324 vertices, girth 19) suggest i probably will lose if you implement it

[sage-support] AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomial' object has no attribute 'lc'

2012-10-31 Thread V
Hello, I try to execute one of the examples for computing the variety of a system of Boolean polynomials from the Sage reference manual: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.html and I get the error: AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomial'

[sage-support] Re: AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomial' object has no attribute 'lc'

2012-10-31 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:39:11 AM UTC-7, V wrote: Hello, I try to execute one of the examples for computing the variety of a system of Boolean polynomials from the Sage reference manual: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.html and I get the

[sage-support] Re: AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomial' object has no attribute 'lc'

2012-10-31 Thread V
Thank you for the quick reply! I tried to compile Sage-5.3 from source and I get an error related to gcc-4.6.3: In file included from /usr/include/features.h:378:0, from /usr/include/stdio.h:28, from ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:87, from

[sage-support] Re: AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomial' object has no attribute 'lc'

2012-10-31 Thread V
Sorry, I was not able to attach the full log file gcc-4.6.3.log. Please find below the most relevant parts of it. ... checking whether the target assembler supports thread-local storage... yes checking whether the thread-local storage support is from emutls... yes configure: updating cache

[sage-support] Re: Cholesky for sparse matrix

2012-10-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
please see this https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cvxopt/xQ-lR9ESijg/discussion far a way to make it more sane. It turns out that cvxopt has un undocumented function to extract the Cholesky factor directly. On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 21:49:48 UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On 2012-10-29,

[sage-support] Re: AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomial' object has no attribute 'lc'

2012-10-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-10-31, V vesselin.velich...@gmail.com wrote: --=_Part_281_17041689.1351705746629 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry, I was not able to attach the full log file gcc-4.6.3.log. Please=20 find below the most relevant parts

Re: [sage-support] Re: Strange results in DiGraph.girth()

2012-10-31 Thread Nathann Cohen
Ahahaaha. Well, I wrote what I thought would be a good if hard to read implementation, and it turns out to be... slower O_O I still do not really understand why, except that copying the graph takes time, too. For some reason. The code is slower in interesting case, and faster in stupid cases :

[sage-support] Re: Cholesky for sparse matrix

2012-10-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi, after a discussion here: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cvxopt/xQ-lR9ESijg/discussion it turns out that there is enough CHOLMOD interface already in Sage, it's just not documented properly. Should I volunteer to get sparse Cholesky implemented for non-exact sparse Sage matrices, via

[sage-support] Re: Cholesky for sparse matrix

2012-10-31 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/31/12 11:53 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: Should I volunteer +1. Always +1 to that question. :) Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-support group. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from