maybe this happened, because the installation failed. Is there a way
to force sage using your url below?
Am Mi 27 Feb 2013 22:32:39 CET schrieb Jeroen Demeyer:
> On 2013-02-27 22:29, Johannes wrote:
>> ls spkg/standard/
> Somehow, many of the spkg files are missing. I don't know how that
> happe
On 2013-02-27 22:29, Johannes wrote:
> ls spkg/standard/
Somehow, many of the spkg files are missing. I don't know how that
happened, but that directory should look like
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.7/sage-5.7/spkg/standard/
--
You received this message because you are sub
ls spkg/standard/
cephes-2.8.p1.spkg libfplll-3.0.12.p3.spkg README.txt
conway_polynomials-0.4.spkg libgap-4.5.7.spkgsage-5.7.spkg
cvxopt-1.1.5.p0.spkg linbox-1.3.2.p0.spkg sagenb-0.10.4.spkg
cython-0.17.4.spkg maxima-5.29.1.p1.spkgsage_root-5.7.spkg
de
ls spkg/standard/
cephes-2.8.p1.spkg libfplll-3.0.12.p3.spkg README.txt
conway_polynomials-0.4.spkg libgap-4.5.7.spkgsage-5.7.spkg
cvxopt-1.1.5.p0.spkg linbox-1.3.2.p0.spkg sagenb-0.10.4.spkg
cython-0.17.4.spkg maxima-5.29.1.p1.spkgsage_root-5.7.spkg
d
And what's the output of (from the SAGE_ROOT):
$ ls -l spkg/standard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
T
The output is contained in the attachment.
Am Mo 25 Feb 2013 19:39:00 CET schrieb Jeroen Demeyer:
> On 2013-02-25 13:57, Johannes wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> I cant build sage 5.7 by sage -upgrade, because it can't download
>> polytopes_db-20120220.
> Can you post the exact terminal output of the proble
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:13:17 PM UTC-5, projetmbc wrote:
>
> Unsatisfied people can join the project and proposes one patch.
>
>
Well, that depends on one's skill level. Simply pointing out a problem or
inadequacy is actually a valuable way of helping.
> Anyone can be agressive
Unsatisfied people can join the project and proposes one patch.
Anyone can be agressive with one commercial project but not with a free
one. That's not correct.
Christophe.
>
> On Monday, February 25, 2013 10:56:31 AM UTC-5, projetmbc wrote:
>>
>> Please, don't be so agressive.
>>
>>
>>
> Inde
Just noticed today that worksheets I've made over the last few weeks have been
not appearing in my active worksheet list. Anyone else seeing this?
-d
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece
On Monday, February 25, 2013 10:56:31 AM UTC-5, projetmbc wrote:
>
> Please, don't be so agressive.
>
>
>
Indeed.
So, it turns out the problem is that a really long answer gets cut off (no
doubt this occurs elsewhere as well). Does anyone have any idea whether
this is some flag we can set tha
In theory,
sage: 4/sqrt(18,hold=True)
should work, but apparently we didn't implement that, nor a hold keyword
with exponents (?). Burcin, can you think of a way to do this?
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:58:06 AM UTC-5, Princess Chidinma
Anusionwu wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I want sage to show ra
I am trying to find the maximun of an exponential expression of the form:
sage: t=var('t')
sage: g(t) = e**(-t/10)-e^(-t/2)
between 0 and say 50. My idea is to get the maximun to normalize the
function to that maximum and obtain the algebraic. For that:
sage: diff(g,t)==0,t)
But sage returns
A = R.gens()[:1]
B = R.gens()[1:]
On Wednesday 27 Feb 2013, Santanu Sarkar wrote:
> Dear all,
>I need two arrays of Boolean variables. So I have written
>
> R=BooleanPolynomialRing(2,['x%d'%(i+1) for i in range
> (1)]+,['y%d'%(i+1) for i in range (1)] )
> R.inject_variable
Hi
I want sage to show rational numbers unsimplified.
e.g. 4/sqrt(18) gets simplified to 2/3sqrt(2) and I don't want that.
Thanks,
Princess
--
ANUSIONWU, Princess Chidinma,
African Institute for Mathematical Sciences
Muizenberg, Cape Town
South Africa
princ...@aims.ac.za, +27739252768
--
You
14 matches
Mail list logo
