On 2014-02-06 08:58, Jori Mantysalo wrote:
and remember this part: "Also, every user in the server pool must share
the same /tmp directory right now - -"
Or apply the patch from
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11679
and you can change that directory.
--
You received this message because you are
Nice, gfortran ICE.
As a workaround, build with
SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes make
compile options:
'-I/app/home/stormrw/programms/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/include
-c'
gfortran:f77: scipy/special/specfun/specfun.f
scipy/special/specfun/specfun.f:2507: internal compiler error
Hi,
I don't know if this is known but I get this error while
building sage 6.1.1 from source on fedora 20:
Found local sources at /sage-6.1.1/upstream/iconv-1.14.tar.bz2
Checksum: 5b5e732cd1eaa01bcfa2b47903ce6ea041a0fae3 vs 5b5e732cd1e
Invalid checksum for /sage-6.1.1/upstream/iconv-1.14.tar.bz2
This works for me on Fedora 20. Something must be wrong with your sed. What
do you get for
$ rpm -qf `which sed`
sed-4.2.2-5.fc20.x86_64
$ rpm -V sed
$ echo 5b5e732cd1eaa01bcfa2b47903ce6ea041a0fae3 | sed 's/[^0-9a-f].*//'
5b5e732cd1eaa01bcfa2b47903ce6ea041a0fae3
On Thursday, February 6, 2014
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> This works for me on Fedora 20. Something must be wrong with your sed. What
> do you get for
>
> $ rpm -qf `which sed`
> sed-4.2.2-5.fc20.x86_64
> $ rpm -V sed
> $ echo 5b5e732cd1eaa01bcfa2b47903ce6ea041a0fae3 | sed 's/[^0-9a-f].*//'
> 5b5e732c
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Vegard Lima wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>> This works for me on Fedora 20. Something must be wrong with your sed. What
>> do you get for
...
>> $ echo 5b5e732cd1eaa01bcfa2b47903ce6ea041a0fae3 | sed 's/[^0-9a-f].*//'
>> 5b5e732cd1eaa
Dear Sage-support,
I'm trying reproduce a function,namely uq, of the variable t which I know
that exist but don't know the symbolic expression of it. I can determine
the expression by a system of 3 equations (eq0,eq1,eq2) and 4 variables
(p0,p1,t,uq) ,as it follows
var('p0 p1 uq q t')
q=0.8
The problem is that Solaris sed is always broken in innovative new ways and
doesn't understand character classes.
It seems that in Norwegian, "aa" is matched like a special character (one
of the weird a's, I guess) and therefore is not in the [a-z] range:
$ export LC_COLLATE=nn_NO.utf8
$ echo a
Fix is at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15791, needs review.
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 1:50:55 PM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> The problem is that Solaris sed is always broken in innovative new ways
> and doesn't understand character classes.
>
> It seems that in Norwegian, "aa" is matche
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 8:36:08 AM UTC-5, Bruno wrote:
>
> Dear Sage-support,
>
> I'm trying reproduce a function,namely uq, of the variable t which I know
> that exist but don't know the symbolic expression of it. I can determine
> the expression by a system of 3 equations (eq0,eq1,eq2)
Thanks for your Info Jason.
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 6:02:15 AM UTC-8, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> On 1/31/14 4:00 PM, y tan wrote:
> > One more problem remaining. Sage notebook doesnt show sage plot. R plot
> > showing fine now.
>
> If I recall correctly, the Sage Cell Server patches to sag
On 2014-02-06 10:17, Tobias Weich wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install sage on a computer of some of our new phd students.
It is a machine running Scientific Linux 6.4.
As Volker said, it's a bug in gfortran. I recommend upgrading your
compiler toolchain or build Sage with SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes.
--
Y
I tried this example myself and got a similar failure. The error
message is not very informative, but what's happening is that PARI-GP
(which Simon's 2-descent script uses) is raising an error, because the
fundamental units of the number fields coming up in the 2-descent
calculation are too big for
Thanks!
Can 6.1.1 be upgraded to with sage -upgrade, or would I need to do a fresh
install?
--Andy
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 2:18:18 PM UTC-6, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Version 5.0 is very old, try installing 6.1.1. Note that 6.1 was very
> recently released but had a similar issue with la
On 2014-02-06 19:19, Andy Miller wrote:
Thanks!
Can 6.1.1 be upgraded to with sage -upgrade, or would I need to do a
fresh install?
You need a fresh install to upgrade from version 5.x to 6.x
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Anders Logg wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr, 16:47, "Ondrej Certik" wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:15 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>>
>> > > > On
16 matches
Mail list logo
