They do implement the same basic algorithm. However, Robert worked
from McKay's paper describing the algorithm, which was approximately
state-of-the-art when he wrote the paper (but of course, the community
tends to eschew optimizations as superfluous to the math, so...).
Also, nauty has some pret
Hi Volker,
On 2014-03-04, Volker Braun wrote:
> --=_Part_318_11599549.1393944350520
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Did you rebuild the cached workspace? I.e. "rm -rf ~/.sage/gap". If you
> manually install a package in GAP then we can't know that a package was
> added...
Yes
Did you rebuild the cached workspace? I.e. "rm -rf ~/.sage/gap". If you
manually install a package in GAP then we can't know that a package was
added...
On Monday, March 3, 2014 9:12:12 PM UTC, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I thought that sage's pexpect interface to GAP just launches "sage -g
Hi,
I would like to do semidirect product of PGL(3,4) with Z_2. The homomorphism
phi: z_2 --> Aut(PGL(3,4) is defined as follows. phi(-1)(A) = (A^{-1})^t. That
is A inverse transpose.
If I can directly find the projective semilinear group P Gamma L(3,4)
using sage, then it is very helpfull
ht
On 2014-03-03, Volker Braun wrote:
> AFAIK both implement the same basic algorithm. My guess is that nauty
> quickly realizes that it has a huge problem and starts constructing graph
> invariants in an attempt to answer it to the negative. If you were to
> compare two graphs that are actually i
