Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage 5.3 and is_subgroup()

2014-12-16 Thread Jori Mantysalo
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, kcrisman wrote: G=TransitiveGroups(6); Unfortunately this requires the `database_gap` which is probably far too new now for an older Sage like that.  I had to try http://sagemath.org/packages/archive/database_gap-4.4.12.p1.spkg (are we still archiving older versions

[sage-support] Re: How to check Mixed Integer Linear Program has no solution

2014-12-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-12-15, pegah Ali wrote: > --=_Part_3151_822295702.1418661065675 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="=_Part_3152_1266595069.1418661065675" > > --=_Part_3152_1266595069.1418661065675 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Hello Everybody, > > Is there

[sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-16 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
Hi all. How long time is a compilation? I am download Sage 5.0.1. Unzipped. Run make. It's been for 3 hours and it still compiles. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-16 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Dmitry Nanyshev wrote: > Hi all. How long time is a compilation? I am download Sage 5.0.1. Unzipped. > Run make. It's been for 3 hours and it still compiles. "4. Wait about 20 minutes to 14 days, depending on your computer (it took about 2 weeks to build Sage on t

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-16 Thread Brian Sherson
That sounds about right, Dmitry. It takes my server a few hours, and it is an 8-core, 3.5 GHz processor. ~Brian On Dec 16, 2014 4:04 PM, "Dmitry Nanyshev" wrote: > Hi all. How long time is a compilation? I am download Sage 5.0.1. > Unzipped. Run make. It's been for 3 hours and it still compiles.

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage 5.3 and is_subgroup()

2014-12-16 Thread kcrisman
> > > (Personally I can't get 5.3 to compile. Singular fails. Not that important > that I would try this any more.) > That's a relatively old Sage, and likely your machine is too new for that version of Sage... or something. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo