>> Ah, right. Yes, evaluating a string representation of an object does
>> *NOT* necessarily result in the same object.
Note that we have sage_input for that
sage: m1 = matrix(ZZ, 2, range(4))
sage: m2 = matrix(GF(7), 2, range(4))
sage: str(m1) == str(m2)
True
sage: sage_input(m1)
matrix(ZZ, [[
Hi Patrick
If you have time to help us isolate it, please download the binary
http://www.sagemath.org/download.html and test that,
(the PPA just repackages that) so that we know whether it is the binary or
introduced by the PPA in certain configurations.
Regards,
Jan
On 15 March 2015 at 15:59, p
I downloaded and compiled the package from the sourcecode and it seems to
be working perfectly (I have to say it took a few hours...).
I have no idea what the problem is with the package, but there it is.
-pb
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 11:40:45 AM UTC-4, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Volker Braun wrote:
> Presumably your program is printf()-ing stuff on the screen. Once the
> stdout buffer fills up your program is paused until the parent reads
> the output, this is how stdout works. Redirect stdout to a file or
> use screen/tmux.
>
On 14 March 2015 at 22:55, david.guichard wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to create a symbolic rational variable--it must be
> possible, right? I want to do something like this:
>
> R = PolynomialRing(QQ,'x');S.=R.quotient(x^3+x+1);S1. = S[];
> (y^3+y+1)(y=a);
> var('b1 b2 b3')
> (b1+b2*a+b3*a^2)^2
Presumably your program is printf()-ing stuff on the screen. Once the
stdout buffer fills up your program is paused until the parent reads the
output, this is how stdout works. Redirect stdout to a file or use
screen/tmux.
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 11:42:50 PM UTC+1, v_...@ukr.net wrote: