[sage-support] Re: Sym Py vs Maxima for symbolic computation

2015-04-30 Thread Ralf Stephan
The main problem facing Sympy may be performance, because they explicitly use Python for everything. It shows for example in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/2635 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-support group. To unsubscribe from this

[sage-support] Re: sage 6.6: libgd may have failed to build

2015-04-30 Thread Dima Pasechnik
this error seems to be arch/gentoo - specific. Perhaps gentoo people can say more. On Thursday, 30 April 2015 04:39:44 UTC+1, fidelbc wrote: Hello, Just trying to build sage on arch linux: [fidbc@avalancha ~]$ uname -a Linux avalancha 3.19.3-3-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Apr 8 14:10:00 CEST

[sage-support] Re: Symbolic computation: ECLS error: No such file or directory

2015-04-30 Thread Gregor Bruns
Here is my guess so far: It seems this is a subtle issue in the interplay between ecls and boehm-gc. The GC initializes as soon as a thread is started, but ecls seems to assume it manually needs to initialize. This generates the error, since the initialization can be done only once. To further

[sage-support] Re: How can I search and count all induced subgraphs in a directed graph with edge labels?

2015-04-30 Thread bssteniss86
Hello, Right now, no. My graphs do not have parallel edges. You are right it is horrible to provide an efficient implementation for labeled subgraph extractions. Just one idea makes my mind busy. I believe what makes the function subgraph does not work for labeled graphs is isomorphic

Re: [sage-support] Re: How can I search and count all induced subgraphs in a directed graph with edge labels?

2015-04-30 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello, I am not sure that I understood your message very well. Are you saying that one way to achieve what you do would be to call the current subgraph_search methods, and to *filter* among its results those which are actually *equal* (considering edge labels) to the graph you are looking for?