On Friday, October 2, 2015 at 8:50:12 PM UTC-7, Selva Raja S wrote:
>
>
> clique_complex() does not shows facets
>
>
>
> *for example*sage:
> g=Graph({1:[2,5,6,3,4],2:[7,3,5,4],3:[8,4,5],4:[9,5],5:[10]})
> sage: g.clique_complex()
> Simplicial complex with 10 vertices and 6 facets
>
You have m
clique_complex() does not shows facets
*for example*sage:
g=Graph({1:[2,5,6,3,4],2:[7,3,5,4],3:[8,4,5],4:[9,5],5:[10]})
sage: g.clique_complex()
Simplicial complex with 10 vertices and 6 facets
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everything is fine
>
> sage: graphs.GrayGraph().diameter()
> 6
> sage: graphs.FosterGraph().diameter()
> 8
>
> If you define a graph with a variable called Gamma and then call a method of
> *another* variable G t
Everything is fine
sage: graphs.GrayGraph().diameter()
6
sage: graphs.FosterGraph().diameter()
8
If you define a graph with a variable called Gamma and then call a
method of *another* variable G then do not expect to get the answer to a
property of Gamma...
Vincent
On 02/10/15 19:01, David
Simllar problem with the Gray graph:
sage: Gamma = graphs.GrayGraph()
sage: G.diameter()
8
(it should be 6)
G = graphs.LCFGraph(54, [-25,7,-7,13,-13,25], 9)
sage: G.diameter()
6
seems to be the Gray graph
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:47 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Davi
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:44 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> Several online sources (including a page on Royle's website) give the
> girth of the Foster graph to be 10, but Sage gives 6:
>
> sage: Gamma = graphs.FosterGraph()
> sage: G.girth()
> 6
>
> Is there a bug in girth?
>
> - David
I m
Hi all:
Several online sources (including a page on Royle's website) give the
girth of the Foster graph to be 10, but Sage gives 6:
sage: Gamma = graphs.FosterGraph()
sage: G.girth()
6
Is there a bug in girth?
- David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
Thank you !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegr
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 07:01:59AM -0700, Topaze wrote:
> What do people using the current Debian stable release install ?
libav-tools
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Hello Sage team.
Quoting installation documentation :
"The following programs are recommended. They are not strictly required at
build time or at run time, but provide additional capablities:
(...)
ffmpeg.
(...)"
The context :
mainuser@station1:~$ lsb_release -d
Description:Deb
(how it looks when rendering log instead of lambertw)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
Hello, i was displaying some equations i was working on in the sage math
cloud, and it rendered a bit funny when i tried the lambert_w function. The
code was:
a3(a1,a0,a2)=(a2*a0^2)/(a1) + 1
to(a1,a0,a2)=1/a0 * ( lambert_w(-1*e^(-1*a3(a1,a0,a2))) + a3(a1,a0,a2))
show(to)
Where as if i changed t
12 matches
Mail list logo
