Hi again Dima, For the record, see below. On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 00:46:06 UTC+10, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Hi, > > I think the best way to fix your issue is to fix > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21313 > This will allow is_isomorphic to use bliss or nauty. > (In fact, IIRC checking for isomorphism is in practice a bit faster than > canonical labelling). > > Also, do I get it right that you have a new "generic" construction of > strongly regular graphs? > As you know, we are collecting them - would you be interested in adding it > into sage/graphs/generators/ ? > > Dima > > How do I add to sage/graphs/generators , based o what I have now, as described below?
I have been developing Sage and Python code for use in my exploration of bent functions and their strongly regular Cayley graphs as described in my recent (today) talk; Classifying bent functions by their Cayley graphs, using Sage <https://sites.google.com/site/paulleopardi/Leopardi-ACCMCC-2016-talk.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1>, 40 ACCMCC, 2016. The code (and manuscript) repository is at https://github.com/penguian/Boolean-Cayley-graphs There is also a public SageMathCloud directory at https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/80f4c9e7-8a37-4f59-82e7-aa179ec0b652/files/Boolean-Cayley-graphs/ with extra SageMathCloud worksheets. I am in the process of updating the code and especially the comments to conform to SageMath expectations, and porting some of the Sage code to Python, where sensible, but some will remain as Sage code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
