On 05/03/2018 20:01, saad khalid wrote:
Hello, and thank you for your response. While I agree that the behaviour of
the function certainly complies with the specifications listed in its
description, I think everyone would agree that it would be better if it did
give all of the roots in a given in
Hello, and thank you for your response. While I agree that the behaviour of
the function certainly complies with the specifications listed in its
description, I think everyone would agree that it would be better if it did
give all of the roots in a given interval. Would you happen to know
anyth
On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 2:42:26 PM UTC, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> It might not be necessary to (re)assign the global variable. Only if the
> user wants to do operations with the polynomial he wants an x to be that
> poly variable, and certainly not another x. So, the parser can do the pa
On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 8:00:34 AM UTC, Simon King wrote:
>
> So, we have two x with different roles. It would make sense to disallow
> the creation of such rings.
>
> -1. It would mean any structure with named generators would have to go dig
into the tower that defines it base to che
