[sage-support] Re: Arithmetic in Jacobians of Hyperelliptic Curves

Hi, On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 10:18:50 AM UTC+9 zsc...@gmail.com wrote: > I have reason to believe that the point P is not torsion and so Magma is > correct and Sage is incorrect. I don't know enough about the algorithms > used to work with points on hyperelliptic Jacobians and so I'm not >

[sage-support] hurwitz_zeta(0, x) = ?

Mathematica: HurwitzZeta[0, x] = 1/2 - x Maple: Zeta(0, 0, x) = -x + 1/2 Sage 9.2:hurwitz_zeta(0, x) = hurwitz_zeta(0, x) --- this is OK: Mathematica: HurwitzZeta[0, 1] = -1/2 Maple: Zeta(0, 0, 1) = -1/2 Sage 9.2:hurwitz_zeta(0, 1) = -1/2 -- You received this mess

[sage-support] Re: sage textbook goes GitHub; don't confuse it with the good one ;-)

That looks great and I am looking forward to reading it more in detail. Just two quick questions to get started. Is this also published on CoCalc? Why do you prefer the use of Sage Worksheets over Jupyter Notebook? Best wishes Ingo john_perry_usm schrieb am Sonntag, 20. Juni 2021 um 02:58:57 UTC+2