On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:43 PM Ronno Das wrote:
>
> Yes, I wrote a wrapper that calls irreducible_characters() once and caches
> the results. There seems to be more issues about the output though, for
> example char_1.symmetric_power(2) throws an error. I think ClassFunction(G,
>
Yes, I wrote a wrapper that calls irreducible_characters() once and caches
the results. There seems to be more issues about the output though, for
example char_1.symmetric_power(2) throws an error. I think ClassFunction(G,
char_1.values()) works as expected, but that's again a workaround and
On Monday, June 21, 2021 at 1:32:07 PM UTC-5 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:08 AM john_perry_usm wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> > Is this also published on CoCalc?
>>
>> Not at the present time. I do mean to talk to someone about it.
>>
>
> Just make a PR to
>
>
I see the same issue on 9.4.beta1. It looks like maybe there is a unique
representation issue happening? That is, on your second call if irreducible
characters, it creates a new instance of the irreducible and so it doesn't
recognize them as the same. If you only compute the
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:07 PM Cosimo Romito
wrote:
> Hi everyone, would anyone be willing to help me with a sage exercise
> related to the base of a radical of a bilinear form? Thank you.
> soon I attach the track
>
>
Ask sagemath has a similar question:
Hi everyone, would anyone be willing to help me with a sage exercise
related to the base of a radical of a bilinear form? Thank you.
soon I attach the track
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
The following code throws the error "GAPError: Error, no method found!
Error, no 1st choice method found for `=' on 2 arguments":
G = SymmetricGroup(3)
char_1 = G.irreducible_character()[0]
char_2 = G.irreducible_character()[0]
char_1.scalar_product(char_2) # should be 1(or maybe 0 if the
