I just downloaded the source for sage-5.0.1. This version of Sage compiled
without problems.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http
Hardware: HP Pavilion (desktop) with Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G620 @ 2.60GHz
Software: Ubuntu 12.04 clean install (not an upgrade)
Problem: Sage 5.0 build failure in ECL: Partial log file:
;*** Lisp core booted
ECL (Embeddable Common Lisp)
;;;
;;; Welcome to bare.lsp. Let's bring this insta
** I'm runing Fedora 10 (PC 32-bit) and Sage-3.2.3 (installed from
source).
** I execute the bundled R software outside of Sage:
[da...@dh04 ~]$ R
R version 2.6.1 (2007-11-26)
Copyright (C) 2007 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R is free software and comes with ABS
OK, thanks. That's good to know.
On Feb 13, 1:19 am, William Stein wrote:
>
> This is a feature of Ipython. Sorry about any confusion it might have caused.
> It's useful, e.g., when using sage partly as a command shell.
>
> -- William
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
T
** I'm running Fedora 10 (PC 32-bit) and Sage-3.2.3. I noticed the
following
** tab completion problem:
** starting Sage and issuing D:
[da...@dh04 ~]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 3.2.3, Release Date: 2009-01-05
David, I re-installed sage-3.0.2 from source and then ran your test
against
sage-3.0.1 and sage-3.0.2. The run times were comparable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage]$ /home/daryl/sage-3.0.1/sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.0.1, Release Date: 20
On Jul 4, 2:58 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Daryl Hammond wrote:
>
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /home/daryl/sage-3.0.1/sage
> > --
> > | SAGE Ver
On Jul 4, 2:23 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Daryl Hammond wrote:
>
>
>
> > David, I ran your two line program on Sage-3.0.3 and obtained:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jul 4, 1:46 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Daryl Hammond wrote:
>
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /home/daryl/sage-3.0.1/sage
> > --
> > | SAGE Ver
On Jul 4, 5:46 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't see anything odd with GMP happening in the logs (but that
> doesn't mean much...)
>
> Daryl, could we try a more direct timing GMP test, to help figure out
> if GMP is possibly the problem. Could you try running
>
> sage: x =
I do not have a place to post the install logs. Here is the cat /proc/
cpuinfo output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
stepping: 9
cpu M
David, I have both install logs available. I have edited them "down"
to about 3,600 lines and 280 KB each. I hesitate to post that much
data here.
-Daryl
On Jul 3, 7:33 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daryl,
>
> Do you have available the original install.log from your 3.0.1 and
>
William, I moved the 11 libgmp* files from /sage-3.0.2/local/lib/ to a
new
/sage-3.0.2/local/libsave/ and re-ran the sieve program. There was no
change
in the elapsed/cpu times (which follow):
/home/daryl/sage-3.0.1/sage /home/daryl/UserData/sage/sieve.sage
=
Jason, your tips on initializing the array and on counting the array
values are appreciated. I'll add these to the next version of the
program. I'll also incorporate your cython suggestion as well. As
you point out, all three of these will speed up the program (and other
programs I have) signif
William, I ran:
/home/daryl/sage-3.0.2/sage -i /home/daryl/sage-3.0.1/spkg/standard/
gmp-4.2.1.p14.spkg
The install completed successfully and install_package() shows both
gmp-4.2.1.p14 and gmp-4.2.2 installed (I could find no sage command to
remove/
uninstall a package):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage]
Thanks Alec for pointing out the incorrect prime count (I was failing
to mark the
last element in the array as non-prime).
Michael, I divided the sieve program into three parts: create array,
mark primes, and
count primes. I then ran the sieve program under sage-3.0.1 and
sage-3.0.2.
Here is a s
tr = 0
array_ctr = -1
while array_ctr < n:
array_ctr = array_ctr + 1
if p[array_ctr] == '1':
ctr = ctr + 1
print 'number of primes:', ctr
# print end time
print
end = time()
print 'End time:
I originally reported this problem with the documentation for
SAGE-2.10.4. I was told that there was no reason to do the ./rebuild
process.
I installed SAGE-2.11 yesterday from source. I did NOT do the ./
rebuild process for the documentation. I now notice that the
documentation for both the "
On Apr 6, 12:41 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 7:11 am, Daryl Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I installed SAGE-2.11 from source and had 1 test fail:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
> > Linux DH04.HA
I installed SAGE-2.11 from source and had 1 test fail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux DH04.HAMMOND 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/dsage/dist_functions/
dist_factor.py
From
On Mar 31, 3:21 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 7:24 am, Daryl Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Problem 3 Documentation build
>
> > Finally I build the documentation with:
> > cd sage-2.10.4/devel/doc
> > .
I installed SAGE-2.10.4 today.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux DH04.HAMMOND 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I had three problems with the install.
---
Problem 1: TEST FAILURE
sage
22 matches
Mail list logo
