On 08:00 Tue 23 Jul 2024, Ziyan He wrote:
When I try to use pip install to install sage-numerical-backends-gurobi, I
encounter the following error:
How are you invoking pip to install sage-numerical-backends-gurobi?
I'm trying to verify that you're using sage's pip and not, for example, your
My college provides a Jupyter interface to Sage that runs version 9.0.
I just tried using the real_nth_root function and got a "no such
function" error. Was the function added after 9.0? Or is this an
installation problem?
It seems that real_nth_root was added in June/July of 2020, making it
> I believe that most of the traffic these days is on sage-support and
> sage-devel, rather than the more specialized groups. Feel free to post
> questions about Sage's algebra capabilities here.
There is some activity on sage-nt too, but sage-support and sage-devel
are much more consistently
This comes from python-prompt-toolkit. See here:
https://github.com/prompt-toolkit/python-prompt-toolkit/pull/1291
This was fixed in python-prompt-toolkit in December, I think in version
3.0.9. Sage is currently using 3.0.5. When we update to use a more recent
version of python-prompt-toolkit,
sage -f [opts] [packages] is a shortcut for force-building specified
packages. If you examine the output of `sage -advanced` on a commandline,
this is noted there. The command `sage -advanced` is a more complete
version of the typical help command `sage -h`.
(I don't know how to solve your
x^5 - 1/18*x^3 +
x
I don't know why what you tried fails. This seems to be a bug.
On the trac, this seems closely related to
1. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11164
2. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30389
- DLD
--
David Lowry-Duda
--
You received this message because you are subs
> I thought that there was a Sage history file somewhere where the last
command I gave would be stored but if there is (as I know there is) it
seems to be unreadable. I think it is in
.sage/ipython-*/profile_default/history.sqlite.
I've never actually tried this, but you're right, it'll be
dle. But I note that it is valid tex and can be
inserted into a regular latex document.
- DLD
--
David Lowry-Duda
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
ARGET=ATOM", as
noted in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/Tv68G0h8Keg
(and elsewhere). I note that Atom worked, even though I did not actually
check to see what sort of architecture lies underneath.
On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 9:12:19 PM UTC-4, David Lowry-Duda wrote
I should also add a link to an old github issue, where I think this
particular setting originally came
from: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/983
On Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 7:51:23 PM UTC-4, David Lowry-Duda wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Firstly, if you are just trying to try S
Hello!
Firstly, if you are just trying to try Sagemath, you might consider
installing a pre-built binary. See for
instance: http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/binary.html
The first time I tried sage, I used a prebuilt binary on Ubuntu, and that
worked very well for me.
Concerning
I have been attempting to build sage on arch recently (but not quite
succeeding so far). For what it's worth, I recently installed sagemath-git
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sagemath-git/) and had no problem,
though. The sagemath-git AUR had a fully functioning sage within it
(although
12 matches
Mail list logo
