This is a request to update the README.txt file used when building from
sources -- the README.txt buries the fact that "-jN" in "make -jN" is
effectively ignored -- but it does make claar, in the details below,
that you need <>.
Since ignoring -jN is non-standard, and since it's important to avoid
How hard would it be to let "make -jN" actually work from the top-level make?
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Joseph P. Skudlarek wrote:
> This is a request to update the README.txt file used when building from
> sources -- the README.txt buries the fact that "-jN" in "make -jN" is
> effectively
On 2014-01-02 19:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
How hard would it be to let "make -jN" actually work from the top-level make?
I created http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15624 for this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe
On 2014-01-02 19:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
How hard would it be to let "make -jN" actually work from the top-level make?
For normal package builds which actually use "make", it should be easy.
For other stuff like the documentation and the Sage library which abuse
the $MAKE variable, very har
On 2014-01-02 19:48, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
How hard would it be to let "make -jN" actually work from the top-level make?
Done. Needs review at
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15624
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscrib
