[sage-support] Re: Binary Upgrade for Mac

2014-08-25 Thread kcrisman
> > > > > > I am running Mavericks, and I only need my notebooks to persist. I am > > currently running 6.2. > > Why don't you just install a binary release of 6.3 for your platform? > It does not destroy your notebooks, as far as I know. > Correct, it lives somewhere totally different. F

[sage-support] Re: Binary Upgrade for Mac

2014-08-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-08-24, Chris Maness wrote: > --20cf3010e841816222050156b1b6 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:23 PM, wrote: > >> >> On Saturday, August 23, 2014 6:28:33 PM UTC-5, Chris Maness wrote: >>> >>> I am thinking I am not a big fan of using the sage -upgrade

Re: [sage-support] Re: Binary Upgrade for Mac

2014-08-23 Thread Chris Maness
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:23 PM, wrote: > > On Saturday, August 23, 2014 6:28:33 PM UTC-5, Chris Maness wrote: >> >> I am thinking I am not a big fan of using the sage -upgrade command since >> it downloads all the source and recompiles the whole thing from source. Is >> there a clean way to upg

[sage-support] Re: Binary Upgrade for Mac

2014-08-23 Thread ssinglet
On Saturday, August 23, 2014 6:28:33 PM UTC-5, Chris Maness wrote: > > I am thinking I am not a big fan of using the sage -upgrade command since > it downloads all the source and recompiles the whole thing from source. Is > there a clean way to upgrade using binaries? > Before offering advice