If I understand you correctly you want to think of your elements as
belonging to a 5-dimensional vector space (or module rather) over
GF(2)[x], while they are being represented as elements of k[x] where k
is a 5-dimensional extension of GF(2).
It's a common problem: mathematically, adjoining
On 9/6/07, Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again! I got the idea now. However, there is a problem which
sticks me in the first stage and if I can solve it so your code work
as prefect for me. The problem is that the instruction
v(z)
is not strong enough for my popuse. It works
Thanks again! I got the idea now. However, there is a problem which
sticks me in the first stage and if I can solve it so your code work
as prefect for me. The problem is that the instruction
v(z)
is not strong enough for my popuse. It works prefect when z is in k =
GF(2^5) but it is not
Thank you very much! These were surprisingly fast replies! I tried to
run william's code, but appearently my version of sage does not
understand padded_list property:
z.polynomial().padded_list(5)
sage: z.polynomial().padded_list(5)
On 9/4/07, Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much! These were surprisingly fast replies!
At sagemath.com we aim to please. :-)
I tried to
run william's code, but appearently my version of sage does not
understand padded_list property:
z.polynomial().padded_list(5)
Yes, that's
On 9/3/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/07, Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to sage and I don't know even if I'm supposed to post such
questions to this group or not. If it is a correct place:
Could you please tell me how can I change the basis in finite field
On 9/4/07, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to define two functions below in order to
do this. If people think something like this would be generally
useful, then it could be made built in to SAGE:
I think it would be nice to have in_terms_of_normal_basis
(of course you
This is the right place but I don't think what you want is implemented.
The commands and examples are here:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/html/ref/module-sage.rings.finite-field.html
It would be some work but possibly you could do what you could in SAGE,
then use GAP's NormalBase command?
On 9/3/07, Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to sage and I don't know even if I'm supposed to post such
questions to this group or not. If it is a correct place:
Could you please tell me how can I change the basis in finite field
representation. As much as know sage represent the finite
