On Oct 17, 3:15 am, GC geoffrey.calk...@gmail.com wrote:
Success! The version compiled on 10.4 seems to work on 10.5.8.
Thanks again for the suggestion.
No problem!
(Anyone - Harald? - know who contributed the 4.5.2 binary? Perhaps it
was compiled on a G5.)
- kcrisman
--
To post to
Sorry, my point being that then it should be renamed.
- kcrisman
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Success! The version compiled on 10.4 seems to work on 10.5.8.
Thanks again for the suggestion.
On Oct 16, 7:47 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 16, 10:21 pm, GC geoffrey.calk...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a great thought. The 10.4 binaries are available, and what's
more,
On Oct 16, 5:17 am, GC geoffrey.calk...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to get Sage up and running for the first time, and I'm
encountering an error (see below).
I installed sage by drag-and-drop onto my hard drive, and double
clicked the sage executable to run it. Looking through old
That's a great thought. The 10.4 binaries are available, and what's
more, the specify that they were compiled on a G4. I will let you
know how that goes.
I am at 1.5GHz / 1.25 Gb, so I would love to avoid compiling myself.
I realize the days are numbered for this machine -- Power stopped
being
On Oct 16, 10:21 pm, GC geoffrey.calk...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a great thought. The 10.4 binaries are available, and what's
more, the specify that they were compiled on a G4. I will let you
know how that goes.
Great, please do.
I am at 1.5GHz / 1.25 Gb, so I would love to avoid
