Ahh yes, sorry, I misspoke. The first part that I ran in the macaulay2.eval
was working fine, it was the sage/m2 conversion that was not working for
me.
Oh okay! I will try to use the GAP interface. It's setup is similar to the
macaulay2 interface, isn't it? As in, I'll be doing gap.eval("the
On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 5:27:30 PM UTC+1, saad khalid wrote:
>
> This is on the same subject, so I thought I'd ask:
>
> I was trying to use the Sage/M2 interface that Dima had been using, but I
> couldn't quite get it to work for me. Here is what I was trying to convert
> to sage:
>
This is on the same subject, so I thought I'd ask:
I was trying to use the Sage/M2 interface that Dima had been using, but I
couldn't quite get it to work for me. Here is what I was trying to convert
to sage:
macaulay2.eval("""
K = toField(QQ[zet]/(zet^6 + zet^5 + zet^4 + zet^3 + zet^2 + zet +
Not sure if this is helpful:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/interfaces/sage/interfaces/macaulay2.html
Sage also has some functions that do the same thing as M2 (I believe they
run on Singular). For eg, Groebner basis:
