Hi cc,
Every thing works ok. I already did a proof with one object and there
was no problem. There was no DeprecationWarning.
Thanks a lot, you're a genius man.
I'll abuse of your amability, and ask a new question. Please, if you
do not have time, don't worry. I know you are very busy with
Hi Alex,
Every thing works ok. I already did a proof with one object and there
was no problem. There was no DeprecationWarning.
Thanks a lot, you're a genius man.
Awesome! I'm glad you got those objects loaded. :)
Do you know the sagetex package? I followed the directions to use the
Craig Citro wrote:
Hi Alex,
Every thing works ok. I already did a proof with one object and there
was no problem. There was no DeprecationWarning.
Thanks a lot, you're a genius man.
Awesome! I'm glad you got those objects loaded. :)
Do you know the sagetex package? I followed the
Hi Alex,
All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The
option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my
problem.
Excellent -- (2) was definitely the easier plan for me. :) I've posted
a patch here:
Hi Craig,
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:41:08 -0800
Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I
could open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was
created by a sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and
when I
Hi Burcin,
The error I get when I try to load the .sobj file linked above in
Sage-3.3 is:
...
/home/burcin/sage/sage-3.3/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/structure/sage_object.so
in sage.structure.sage_object.loads
(sage/structure/sage_object.c:6156)()
RuntimeError: (None,
Hi Craig,
Thanks for explanation, it was clear. Now I have six files, but the
program is still running and will generate more files. So, I would
love you can explain me how to fix the problem.
Thanks,
Alex
On 1 mar, 23:41, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
From command line of
Ah, does this mean you have a running copy of 3.1.1 still? Because I
think it'll be easier to give you a patch against 3.1.1 than a patch
against 3.2.3 ...
-cc
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Alex Lara lrodr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for explanation, it was clear. Now I have six
Hey Craig,
I have 3.2.3 in my laptop, but I use the machines of the University
(which have 3.1.1) to do computations that take long time.
---Alex
On 2 mar, 11:19, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, does this mean you have a running copy of 3.1.1 still? Because I
think it'll be
Hi Alex,
Well, I have one question first before deciding the right way to
proceed. Are all the objects you're creating the same general shape as
the ones in the test.sobj you posted -- collections of polynomials
over rational function fields in one variable over finite fields? If
so, then we
Hi cc,
All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The
option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my
problem.
Alex
On 2 mar, 12:21, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
Well, I have one question first before deciding the right way to
Hi cc,
All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The
option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my
problem.
Alex
On 2 mar, 12:21, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
Well, I have one question first before deciding the right way to
Hi Alex,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Alex Lara lrodr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using Sage 3.2.3. I can't load objects created and saved with Sage
3.1.1. I got the following message:
DeprecationWarning: Your data is stored in an old format. Please use
the save() function to store your
From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I could
open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was created by a
sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and when I tried to open
it on sage 3.2.3. Here you will find that object:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Alex Lara lrodr...@gmail.com wrote:
From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I could
open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was created by a
sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and when I tried to open
it on sage
From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I could
open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was created by a
sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and when I tried to open
it on sage 3.2.3. Here you will find that object:
16 matches
Mail list logo