On Dec 10, 6:46 am, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case you're curious, here are some timings for higher powers along
with memory usage.
sage: s = SFASchur(QQ)
sage: f = s([2,1])
sage: get_memory_usage()
515.17578125
sage: time a = f^10
CPU times: user 6.64 s, sys: 0.03 s,
On Dec 9, 2007 8:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use the combinatorics features in Sage to do some Chern
class calculations. When I run the commands below, I get exceptions
that I don't know how to interpret.
The same calculation in Maple using John
On Dec 10, 5:20 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 8:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use the combinatorics features in Sage to do some Chern
class calculations. When I run the commands below, I get exceptions
that I don't know
Hello,
The actual issue was that I forgot to covert symmetrica's LONGINT type
( 22 ) over to the correct Sage type. I hadn't actually tested it
with calculations that got up to numbers that big. I made a ticket
for this and posted a patch: http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1445
It will be
That was fast!
Thanks for looking into the problem. I'll be doing more extensive
calculations over the next couple of weeks (I'm porting some Maple
code). I'll let you know if I run into any other problems. I'm excited
about the prospect of a 17-fold performance increase.
Thanks very much,
--
On Dec 9, 2007 8:44 PM, BFJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was fast!
Thanks for looking into the problem. I'll be doing more extensive
calculations over the next couple of weeks (I'm porting some Maple
code). I'll let you know if I run into any other problems. I'm excited
about the prospect
In case you're curious, here are some timings for higher powers along
with memory usage.
sage: s = SFASchur(QQ)
sage: f = s([2,1])
sage: get_memory_usage()
515.17578125
sage: time a = f^10
CPU times: user 6.64 s, sys: 0.03 s, total: 6.67 s
Wall time: 6.74
sage: get_memory_usage()
526.26171875
