[sage-support] Re: Problem in new Sage version

2018-07-10 Thread Simon King
On 2018-07-10, slelievre wrote: > you have the choice between the following: > > sage: V = PolynomialRing(GF(2), 49, xxz) > ... > sage: V = BooleanPolynomialRing(49, xxz) I think that's a very dangerous statement, as the boolean polynomial ring is a *quotient* of the above polynomial

[sage-support] Re: Problem in new Sage version

2018-07-10 Thread slelievre
In other words, either use BooleanPolynomialRing without specifying GF(2), or use PolynomialRing and specify GF(2). If you set sage: xxz = ['x%d'%(i) for i in range(1, 49)] + ['Z'] you have the choice between the following: sage: V = PolynomialRing(GF(2), 49, xxz) sage: V Multiv

[sage-support] Re: Problem in new Sage version

2018-07-06 Thread Kwankyu
What is your point? Remove GF(2) as this is over GF(2) by default. On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 2:00:34 PM UTC+9, chandra chowdhury wrote: > > Initial version of Sage this worked perfectly > > *V=BooleanPolynomialRing(GF(2),49,['x%d'%(i) for i in range(1,49)]+['Z'])* > > But now I am getting error