sage-support is one of the best list. English is not my mother language and
sometimes I don't explain myself well but always people here are very kind
and trying to help... It's very important this can long !
Le vendredi 14 septembre 2018 18:00:55 UTC+2, Peter Luschny a écrit :
>
> How can I
Thanks. This answer my question and I put the tip
in https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/NFtI5XqjQWg/sz5WPcFMAgAJ
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 3:58:50 AM UTC-8, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I recommend importing anything you need from sage.all since the details of
> where everything is
I wonder why for me the result is
>>> import_statements(QQ)
# ** Warning **: several names for that object: Q, QQ from
sage.rings.rational_field import Q
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 4:05:55 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:58 AM John Cremona > wrote:
> >
> >
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:58 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> I recommend importing anything you need from sage.all since the details of
> where everything is might change in time. This works perfectly well:
>
> $ sage -python # so we use Sage's python not my system-wide one
> Python 2.7.15
Thank you both for the answers. However, I’m still stuck:
Focusing on just translating the first line: R. = QQ[]
In sage,
>>> preparse("R. = QQ[]")"R = QQ['x']; (x,) = R._first_ngens(1)">>>
>>> import_statements(QQ)# ** Warning **: several names for that object: Q,
>>> QQfrom
Mon 2018-11-19 09:41:03 UTC+1, Simon King:
>
> If I recall correctly, there is a function that for *many* (not all)
> interactively created objects in Sage tells how they can be constructed,
> but I don't recall the name of that function.
That is sage_input, which can be used as follows:
Hi
On 2018-11-19, Kolen Cheung wrote:
> Then I thought I can import it in Python like this:
>
> import sage.rings
> # OK
>
> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_ring.PolynomialRing_field
> # AttributeError
Admittedly the following is not an ideal solution, but you can do
>>> from sage import
