[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 26, 1:36 am, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- dortmund.de wrote: I do not see how that rules out clisp 2.47 - or am I just not getting what you are driving at :) I meant if I can recreate the problem from 3.4 source as well as 3.4.1 source then doesn't that mean I can recreate

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 26, 11:05 pm, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 26, 1:36 am, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- dortmund.de wrote: I do not see how that rules out clisp 2.47 - or am I just not getting what you are driving at :) I meant if I can recreate the problem from 3.4

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread Jason Grout
mabshoff wrote: On Apr 25, 12:23 am, Paul Zimmermann paul.zimmerm...@loria.fr wrote: Michael, Hi Paul, And Sage 3.4: | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 27, 2:33 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: I just upgraded to Jaunty over the weekend, and then compiled 3.4.1 from scratch.  Both expressions work for me: Hmm. Does Sage leave a log build regarding the compilation? Perhaps my build had some errors yours doesn't

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread Jason Grout
Chris Seberino wrote: On Apr 27, 2:33 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: I just upgraded to Jaunty over the weekend, and then compiled 3.4.1 from scratch. Both expressions work for me: Hmm. Does Sage leave a log build regarding the compilation? Perhaps my build had

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-26 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 10:42 pm, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 25, 7:02 pm, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- dortmund.de wrote: What should I do until Sage 4.0?  Is there a way to tweak my 3.4.1 to use clisp 2.47? Do you mean clisp 2.46 since 3.4.1 ships with clisp

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 24, 7:09 pm, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- dortmund.de wrote: So I cannot reproduce this. What platform are you on and are you using a binary, build from source, etc? I'm on an Ubuntu 9.04 ThinkPad T41 laptop. I built my Sage install from 3.4 source myself as there was no

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Paul Zimmermann
Michael, And Sage 3.4: | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| -- sage:

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 12:23 am, Paul Zimmermann paul.zimmerm...@loria.fr wrote:        Michael, Hi Paul, And Sage 3.4: | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11                         | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 25, 2:10 am, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- dortmund.de wrote: I ran this on 3.4, 3.4.1 and a couple other rc releases in between: sage: for i in (0..200): :     numerical_integral(sin(pi*exp(x/2)),0,2)[0] : and I could not get a failure. Hmm. That is weird. I

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 2:17 pm, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Chris, On Apr 25, 2:10 am, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- SNIP Hmm. That is weird.  I just compiled 3.4.1 from source and got the same error on the newer version too. Ok. SNIP That seems to be the only delta

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 25, 5:36 pm, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- dortmund.de wrote: Not really, we switched from clisp 2.46 to 2.47 and if you look at    https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/753a8d2f3c052183 for some people who have had issues for a long, long time we could never get

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 6:38 pm, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 25, 5:36 pm, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- Hi Chris, dortmund.de wrote: Not really, we switched from clisp 2.46 to 2.47 and if you look at    https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/753a8d2f3c052183

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 25, 7:02 pm, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni- dortmund.de wrote: What should I do until Sage 4.0?  Is there a way to tweak my 3.4.1 to use clisp 2.47? Do you mean clisp 2.46 since 3.4.1 ships with clisp 2.47 while Sage 3.4 used clisp 2.46? Since *I* was able to reproduce

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-24 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 24, 7:03 pm, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Notice first and second are very similar except for the cos() and exp (). Why first one ok but second bombs? sage: numerical_integral(sin(pi*cos(x/2)),0,2)[0] 0.85397903781471396 I guess you are using Sage 3.4? Works