[sage-support] Re: assume(...) is very slow

2008-11-20 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm probably not the right one to respond to this one, but please, do! > I get reminded of this every time I run through any of my worksheets, > but then I usually get distracted by the results before I get to send > o

[sage-support] Re: assume(...) is very slow

2008-11-20 Thread Stan Schymanski
I'm probably not the right one to respond to this one, but please, do! I get reminded of this every time I run through any of my worksheets, but then I usually get distracted by the results before I get to send out an email about it. Thanks for picking it up again! Stan On Nov 20, 6:46 am, mabsh

[sage-support] Re: assume(...) is very slow

2008-11-19 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 14, 6:47 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This could be greatly sped up by changing >    maxima.assume('...') > to >   maxima.eval("assume(..)") > in the calculus code... > > sage: timeit("maxima.eval('assume(x>0)')") > 5 loops, best of 3: 53.2 ms per loop > sage: timeit("

[sage-support] Re: assume(...) is very slow

2008-10-14 Thread William Stein
This could be greatly sped up by changing maxima.assume('...') to maxima.eval("assume(..)") in the calculus code... sage: timeit("maxima.eval('assume(x>0)')") 5 loops, best of 3: 53.2 ms per loop sage: timeit("maxima.assume(x>0)") 5 loops, best of 3: 122 ms per loop I don't have time to do