On Oct 24, 2007, at 09:21 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 10/24/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I always build like the above on sage.math or my mac pro.
>>
>> To complete this discussion:
>>
>> On my 2x3.0GHz Quad Xeon Mac, I got the following:
>>
>> Without the above, the bui
Picking up this thread:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 21:29 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 23, 6:19 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> However, I have to rerun the build from scratch: it seems to depend
>> on /usr/local/lib: maxima won't run with that name change. I
>> neglected to note whi
On 10/24/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I always build like the above on sage.math or my mac pro.
>
> To complete this discussion:
>
> On my 2x3.0GHz Quad Xeon Mac, I got the following:
>
> Without the above, the build took ~71 minutes.
>
> With the above, both for "-j6" and "
On Oct 22, 2007, at 21:56 , William Stein wrote:
>
>>> Can I build sage with something like '-j 4'? It's a shame to see
>>> all
>>> those cores sitting idle :-}
>>>
>>
>> It should work, the packages that fail to build properly with j>1 (I
>> believe only Singular is affected) reset that flag
An update:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 21:29 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 23, 6:19 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, Michael,
>> I did this for both '/lib' and '/include', just for grins, and cddlib
>> did build successfully.
>>
>
> Ok, please open a ticket for cddlib-094b then.
Wi
On Oct 22, 2007, at 21:56 , William Stein wrote:
>
>>> Can I build sage with something like '-j 4'? It's a shame to see
>>> all
>>> those cores sitting idle :-}
>>>
>>
>> It should work, the packages that fail to build properly with j>1 (I
>> believe only Singular is affected) reset that flag
Hi, Michael,
On Oct 22, 2007, at 21:29 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 23, 6:19 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is that the dual Quad Core Mac box or do you have access to some
>>> truly
>>> monster box from Apple?
>>
>> You know I can't talk about that :-}
>>
>> But in any ca
> > Can I build sage with something like '-j 4'? It's a shame to see all
> > those cores sitting idle :-}
> >
>
> It should work, the packages that fail to build properly with j>1 (I
> believe only Singular is affected) reset that flag. Give it a try and
> report back any issues you encounter ;)
On Oct 23, 6:19 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Michael,
>
> On Oct 22, 2007, at 20:10 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Oct 23, 3:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Oct 20, 2007, at 23:53 , William Stein wrote:
> >> I'm building 2.8.8.1 from scratch on
Hi, Michael,
On Oct 22, 2007, at 20:10 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Oct 23, 3:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Oct 20, 2007, at 23:53 , William Stein wrote:
>> I'm building 2.8.8.1 from scratch on a 8x3GHz Xeon Mac Pro (Mac OS X/
>> 10.4.10), and have run into a build glitch:
On Oct 23, 3:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2007, at 23:53 , William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it athttp://sagemath.org, as usual,
> > or just do "sage -upgrade".
>
> > This release benefited hugely from work of Martin A
On 10/21/07, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear William,
>
> > I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it athttp://sagemath.org, as usual,
> > or just do "sage -upgrade".
>
> I did "sage -upgrade".
>
> The upgrade was interactive: At some point i was informed that
> "remote" wanted to do somethin
Dear William,
> I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it athttp://sagemath.org, as usual,
> or just do "sage -upgrade".
I did "sage -upgrade".
The upgrade was interactive: At some point i was informed that
"remote" wanted to do something with some test.py (sorry, i forgot the
exact path) that "local"
13 matches
Mail list logo
