On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. Pity, I thought I omitted something obvious.
>
> For some reason, Mathematica and Maple seem to do better at solving
> such equations, even though the results can become a bit conv
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your feedback. Pity, I thought I omitted something obvious.
For some reason, Mathematica and Maple seem to do better at solving
such equations, even though the results can become a bit convoluted.
Sometimes, SAGE manages to solve an equation if it is re-formulated in
a differ
Hi Stan,
I don't think there is any other way to solve an equation such as that
in Sage. You can do it using Sage's interface to Maple (if you have
it installed / access to it), but it's not as clean as it should be
due to bug #3610.
sage:
var('wcnew,epsln,ysnew,delyu,sumsunew,sunlayersnew,dely
