Dear Michael,
On Nov 27, 8:55 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Interesting trick. But with Sage 3.2 or higher you can actually get
> the performance data back from timeit -
> seehttp://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b91c51...
> about the Integral tes
On Nov 27, 11:38 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Michael,
Hi Simon,
> On Nov 27, 8:26 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > Yes.
>
> Finally I understood something. By the way, it seems to me that this
> detail is not described in the documentation (of Sa
Dear Michael,
On Nov 27, 8:26 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Yes.
Finally I understood something. By the way, it seems to me that this
detail is not described in the documentation (of Sage :)
> > What can I do to change it?
>
> You doctesting example.
Sniff :(
But a min
On Nov 27, 11:22 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear William,
>
> I think I finally see where my problem comes from: Is it true that a
> line starting with '... ' is considered as a Sage prompt, respectively
> as a continuation of the preceding line?
Yes.
> Hence, apparently the
Dear William,
I think I finally see where my problem comes from: Is it true that a
line starting with '... ' is considered as a Sage prompt, respectively
as a continuation of the preceding line?
I think so, because of the following.
In a file foobar.py, I put
def f(x):
r"""
test
EXAMPLES:
Dear William,
On Nov 27, 5:28 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what do you mean by "the documentation"?
The Sage documentation.
> There is documentation about Python's doctest system here:
>
> http://www.python.org/doc/2.5.2/lib/module-doctest.html
I had
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Another related question:
> Suppose that the output contains three dots (...). How can I make
> clear that these three dots are *not* an ellipsis but that I do
> expect ... in the output?
>
> I tried to find something about
Another related question:
Suppose that the output contains three dots (...). How can I make
clear that these three dots are *not* an ellipsis but that I do
expect ... in the output?
I tried to find something about Ellipsis in the documentation, but it
doesn't seem to be there. Or is it?
Best reg
