> The main purpose of my email was to make a point about "trusting" the
> answers being crucial to the sage project. After sending the email I
> realised another viewpoint: if you stuck to a "safe" version of sage
> on sagenb.org, few people would use the alpha server and you'd lose a
> great oppo
On Jun 14, 5:00 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Marky Marc wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > The two machines listed in the subject line seem to be running
> > different versions of sage, viz. "4.0.1" and "4.0.rc0" respectively.
>
> They are both running sage version 4.0.1. The
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Marky Marc wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The two machines listed in the subject line seem to be running
> different versions of sage, viz. "4.0.1" and "4.0.rc0" respectively.
They are both running sage version 4.0.1. The notebook sever on
alpha.sagenb.org is still 4.0.rc0, bu
