Am Montag, 7. Februar 2011 13:48:51 UTC+1 schrieb Mike Hansen:
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Laurent wrote:
> > Le 07/02/2011 13:05, Clemens Heuberger a écrit :
> >> sage: abs(pi*I)
> >> I*pi
> I believe the underlying cause is due to #10064, #10583, #7160, and #6132
all of which are the sa
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Laurent wrote:
> Le 07/02/2011 13:05, Clemens Heuberger a écrit :
>>
>> I encountered the following bug:
>>
>> sage: abs(pi*I)
>> I*pi
>
> I do not know how we define absolute value in Sage. Even in math in general,
> I'm not sure of what means the absolute value of
Le 07/02/2011 13:05, Clemens Heuberger a écrit :
I encountered the following bug:
sage: abs(pi*I)
I*pi
I do not know how we define absolute value in Sage. Even in math in
general, I'm not sure of what means the absolute value of a complex
number. Depends on the data of a convex cone ?
I su
I encountered the following bug:
sage: abs(pi*I)
I*pi
The correct answer would have been pi.
Several other examples show a different behaviour, e.g.
sage: abs(log(2)*I)
abs(I*log(2))
Here, the answer is correct (but not particularly helpful, log(2)
would have been better).
I do not know wheth
