Thanks! I did not expect a particular simplification of the function; the
problem is that the given simplification caused problems. This function
appeared as a factor in the computation of the curvature of some spatial
curve.
El domingo, 15 de enero de 2017, 15:50:06 (UTC+1), Michael Orlitzky
On 01/14/2017 03:42 AM, Enrique Artal wrote:
> This is true. The problem is that if not used, simple expressions keep to
> be too much complicated. Is there any compromise?
>
There is simplify_full() which should be safe for all expressions, and
simplify_real() that assumes everything is real. T
This is true. The problem is that if not used, simple expressions keep to
be too much complicated. Is there any compromise?
El viernes, 13 de enero de 2017, 21:08:16 (UTC+1), Michael Orlitzky
escribió:
>
> On 01/13/2017 05:12 AM, Enrique Artal wrote:
> > I would like to know how to handle with
On 01/13/2017 05:12 AM, Enrique Artal wrote:
> I would like to know how to handle with this issue. Consider a function
> f=sqrt(cos(x)^3 - 3*cos(x)^2 - cos(x) + 6). It is possible to deal with
> this function for standard procedures like numerical_integral in (-1,1).
> If one considers f.canonicali
I would like to know how to handle with this issue. Consider a function
f=sqrt(cos(x)^3 - 3*cos(x)^2 - cos(x) + 6). It is possible to deal with
this function for standard procedures like numerical_integral in (-1,1). If
one considers f.canonicalize_radical() it is presented as sqrt(cos(x)^2 -
c
