RE: [SA-list] SNMP checks

2002-09-20 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
what does the logfile show are returned value? Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: [SA-list] Mail Servers (revisited)

2002-09-20 Thread Viktor Sokol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello doubleu, Look at http://www.altn.com/ I havn`t seen better mail server for NT Thursday, September 19, 2002, 11:09:10 PM, you wrote: d> Guys, forgive the off-topic-ness of this question. I know this was d> discussed 2 months ago or so, but

[SA-list] SNMP checks

2002-09-20 Thread Dolinar, Jon
Title: Message SA 3.2.1087   I have some SNMP checks (ups's)  that check to see the value is >0 . That works fine as long as the device is actually online and running I get the corect result.  If the device is off and it returns nothing the check passes as >0 and therfore running? So when t

RE: [SA-list] HTTP/1.1

2002-09-20 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
We're looking at adding this to v4. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mrogers Sent: Fri Sep 20 5:29 PM To: '[

RE: [SA-list] HTTP/1.1

2002-09-20 Thread mrogers
Yes, true. But then we wouldn't be using the built-in conveniences of ServersAlive URL check. This is going to be pain for us when our production boxes come up on SiteMinder and require HTTP/1.1 (or at minimum the "host" variable in the header). Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: J

RE: [SA-list] Mail Servers (revisited)

2002-09-20 Thread Troy Hilton
We use Ipswitch's IMail. It's been good for us and it doesn't require much processing power to run, especially for 65 users. www.ipswitch.com Troy D. Hilton SofWerks LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of doubleu Sent: T

Re: [SA-list] HTTP/1.1

2002-09-20 Thread Jack Lyons \(Martin Agency\)
I am seem to be the Perl evangelist, but I believe you could write check that would use http/1.1 in perl - Original Message - From: "Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:42 AM Subject: RE: [SA-list] HTTP/1.1 > Currently it only doe

Re: [SA-list] Mail Servers (revisited)

2002-09-20 Thread Jack Lyons \(Martin Agency\)
Why do you want to change. You can use outlook with GWise using the IMAP4/POP3/SMTP features of GWISE. - Original Message - From: "doubleu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:09 PM Subject: [SA-list] Mail Servers (revisited) > Guys, forgive

RE: [SA-list] Mail Servers (revisited)

2002-09-20 Thread Steve Davis
or FTGate www.ftgate.co.uk -Original Message- From: Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 September 2002 06:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SA-list] Mail Servers (revisited) You may want to take a look at IMail. http://www.ipswitch.com/products/IMail_Server/ - Original M