RE: [SA-list] YAFR (yet another feature request)

The HostID is not used for the RRD graphs. The HostID is only usefull for the numeric paging, it's a numeric represenatation of the entry. One that you as user can create/edit/ And it does not have to be unique The uniqueID is as the name says it unique. A ctrl-D of an entry will indeed dupl

Re: [SA-list] YAFR (yet another feature request)

My issue started with a total disregard for the host id's in general, compounded by frequent check duplication. (for instance, I have 8 servers for Citrix. I created the checks for the first then duplicated for the other 7.) The trick, I have learned, is that when you duplicate a check, (with CTRL

Re: [SA-list] YAFR (yet another feature request)

I use Host IDs to do just that - id a host. Each host gets a unique ID and all checks for that host use the same ID. This becomes very useful when using the interchange file to generate reports. I guess you could have SA check to make sure each first level check has a unique host ID but I'm n

[SA-list] YAFR (yet another feature request)

Dirk, I have had a hard time resolving duplicated host-id's in the past. Is there an option that I can enable or can you add an option in the setup window to enable or disable a verification upon saving of the checks to ensure (or allow) duplicated host id's? Is there a reason to allow dupplicat

RE: [SA-list] Monitoring proxy servers

We are sure that the option of the 2 proxies work :-)  (try it with an unexisting proxy and you'll see that you will get a down)   The GET that is done includes a "Pragma: no-cache", so this means that we "ask" the proxy not to get the page from the cache.   We have direct plans to add more

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Title: Feature request... HTML output, then interchange logging (file and db) and executive alerts.     Dirk Bulinckx.   From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael ShookSent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 6:36 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: R

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Title: Feature request... Ah, hadn't thought of doing the HTTP Get there. I was thinking along the lines of an "always" alert.   So, it's HTML Output, then Status Db, then Interchange Db, then exec. alerts?   Michael D. ShookTechnical AnalystSaddle Creek CorporationMichael.Shook@saddlecrk.co

RE: [SA-list] Availability stats

SK is enabled for those and pretty much all our entries (i.e. including those that just show 100%) The 200% stat seems to be unique to checks that (a) are pings, AND (b) have other checks dependent on them. Ian _ Ian K Gray OEL IS - European Infrastructure Suppo

RE: [SA-list] Availability stats

What are you using as parameter to get the % And do you have SK (second knock) enabled for that/those entries?   Dirk Bulinckx.   From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 5:52 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion

[SA-list] Availability stats

Dirk, Quite a few of my availability stats report as 200%. Whilst I'm sure that my pointy haired boss will be delighted at how efficient it appears that we are, I'm somewhat suspicious... Any ideas? Is this a known problem? What period of time does the availability stat reflect? (I have a feelin

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Title: Feature request... Not sure about that. The HTML page generation is done before the interchangefile is generated and before the executive alerts.  And with the interchange file generation you can "request" a command to be executed after the generation of it.  That command could be a VB

[SA-list] Monitoring proxy servers

We're having some problems with internet access from one of our sites (i.e. it's running slow), and the primary suspect is the proxy server there. I'm trying to set up SA to monitor a web page via one proxy (at this site) and then monitor the same page via the suspect proxy at another site (across

RE: [SA-list] Checks fail due to lack of resources locally

Sounds like the perfdata ocx, you will need version 1.0.0.53. Jim -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:40 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Checks fail du

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Title: Feature request... Also, I just realized, since the recap data I'm looking for isn't written to the HTML output until the end of the check process, any method I have of importing it into a db (HTTP GET for instance) wouldn't happen until the next check cycle. This would be an unaccepta

RE: [SA-list] Is your web site down?

it WAS down for a couple of minutes...but it's up again   Dirk Bulinckx.   From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ahmed HassanSent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:37 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: [SA-list] Is your web site down? Hi DirkCan y

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Title: Feature request... Apologies I misread your message...   Although SQL Enterprise shouldn't take 'several' seconds to return result from 3 million... From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael ShookSent: 28 June 2006 15:56To: Servers Alive Discu

[SA-list] Is your web site down?

Hi DirkCan you please confirm whether your wetther your web site is down? I keep getting the following error message "Internal srever Error - The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request". To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as su