RE: [SA-list] Direct mail sending (without an "internal" SMTP server)

I wouldn't have any use for it. If I need that capability, I prefer simply install a little smtp service locally and point the app to localhost as the smtp server. Leaving it our would keep SA leaner and cleaner. It is dispiriting when every app vendor in the world seems to decided to add their own

RE: [SA-list] MSN alert

Jabber? > > > dirk. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of arley dealey > Sent: Sun Aug 24 10:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SA-list] MSN alert > > > Neither AIM nor ICQ would be a s

RE: [SA-list] MSN alert

Neither AIM nor ICQ would be a solution for us since they are both America Online products and therefore not allowed on our boxes by policy. Dirk... what's the chance of Jabber? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Mark Bradshaw > Sent: Frid

RE: [SA-list] Feature Requests

a single place, commonly administered.   arley dealey network administrator omnex systems

[SA-list] Scott Finney's Software Hall of Fame

Scott Finney has begun a Software Hall of Fame (and a Hall of Shame) in his newsletters (which are very good, by the way). Under my "Texaganian" nom-de-web I've nominated ServersAlive for a top spot in the Hall of Fame. Anyone who wants to could drop by his web site at http://www.scotsnewsle

RE: [SA-list] Alerts

Title: Message Again, I'll second Kevin's request. It would be helpful if a update preserved the service settings.   arley -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin StoneSent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:39 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]S

RE: [SA-list] Alerts

I'll definitely second this request. One of the few things I really want that I haven't been able to devise a work-around.   >> Where do you want to see this? HTML output? Mail?   Yes. Both please. Actually, I want to be able to use it in any sort of alert which SA can generate (this is a g

RE: [SA-list] Hmmm

Yes, you will find this FAR easier. I implemented a scheme to achieve this (similar to the one someone else recommended to you) quite a while ago but it was a LOT of work and made for a very, very complex configuration... plus half of the check entries always showed up in orange because they depend

RE: [SA-list] Hmmm

Thanks, Dirk. I've been accomplishing that for a long time but it involved multiple dependent checks and an overly complicated configuration to make it happen. This will VASTLY simplify my check configuration! Arley > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED